you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

If that were the case, they wouldn't have killed the Ayatollah, the one man preventing Iran from having a nuclear weapon with his religious Fatwa against nuclear weapons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah sure the Ayatollah was taking a sabbatical when they were mass producing that enriched uramium

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    No.

    Iran is a civilization with political factions and a robust political system.

    The faction that thought nukes would be stabilizing for the region (and time is showing that they were correct) wanted to be able to have nukes very quickly should the Ayatollah change his mind.

    Your understanding of Iran is basically just spoon fed propaganda with no critical thought. Go comment on things you actually know anything about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    The Iranian government basically murdered or tortured into submission any other political factions. The only 'factions' you see are subsets of the shia extremist faction. Sure, nukes would 'stabilize' their rule but its funnysad that you would try to present that as something preferable for those oppressed by it

  • source
  • parent