44
Can federating be modified so it's not dependent domain names? (ttrpg.network)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 5 months ago (4 children)

unfortunately, atproto doesnt scale horizontally as AcitivytPub does. so, really, no one should use it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    It's still at a very early stage, and they do have hosting costs in mind.

    It's the first proposal I've seen trying to solve the problem

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    im not saying the fediverse isnt without its serious challenges. that said;

    sorry, not letting bluesky havin my keys.. but you do you.

    i just dont understand people putting their effort into a piece of shit, corporate backed protocol like AT when AP is already more mature, in use, and with large contingent of active developers.

    its portability is at the whim of those running the system. its still not your data. you can take your pod.. and go where? all those other routers that will startup just any day now? after 3 years i think there's 2 routers.. and they dont talk to eathother. hilarious.

    any day now!

    its just twitter 2.0 with more steps and all the same executives.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 5 months ago

    i just dont understand people putting their effort into a piece of shit, corporate backed protocol like AT when AP is already more mature, in use, and with large contingent of active developers.

    Stupidity. It's the answer to most confusion about why "the masses" do what they do.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent