▲ 148 ▼ yeah, I'm a centrist (thelemmy.club) submitted 5 months ago by sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 23 points 5 months ago (21 children) Authoritarian 🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 21 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 months ago* (18 children) For those that don't want to sound uneducated like @bearboiblake@pawb.social https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1872/10/authority.htm permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -12 points 5 months ago* (17 children) Thank you for sharing! Do you realize that what you shared doesn't argue that Marxism-Leninism is not authoritarian, but instead just reframes it as necessarily authoritarian? As in, it implies authoritarianism is necessary to achieve communism. Argue that it is good, necessary, be my guest, but it is authoritarian. I will leave you with an excerpt from the writing you shared which resonated with me deeply, and highlights essentially the root issue I have with MLs: A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 months ago (15 children) You didn't read the text, I can tell. Do you realize that what you shared doesn’t argue that Marxism-Leninism is not authoritarian, Duh, because we have a different understanding of authority. but instead just reframes it as necessarily authoritarian? As in, it implies authoritarianism is necessary to achieve communism. Argue that it is good, necessary, be my guest, but it is authoritarian. No, the text asks if organisation in the most abstract sense is possible without authority and highlights that with the advent of capitalism labour is a highly socialized process. It argues that authority in a socialist society takes on a different form. the root issue I have with MLs The root issue I have with libs is that they think you can simply vote capitalism away, when it's been demonstrated time and time again that you cant permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -16 points 5 months ago (14 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago* (13 children) I don't read and understand theory. I call anything I don't like authoritarian repeating imperialist propaganda blindly Ok stay ignorant permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -16 points 5 months ago (12 children) Comrade, I think you have confused me for an enemy. MLs have a pretty decent argument that a transitional state is necessary to achieve communism. I understand all of that, and I've read more than my fair share of theory over the years. Just because someone disagrees with you, it does not mean that they are stupid, not reading, ignorant, etc. That is an extremely reactionary approach to criticism which prevents you from ever having to have your viewpoints truly challenged. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago (11 children) I'm willing to be less antagonist in my responses, but yours make it very difficult to do so. I don't like wasting my energy on confidently wrong libs that misrepresent what is trying to be said in this community. When you misrepresent and think what is being said is: Marxism-Leninism isn’t authoritarian! It isn’t authoritarian because I said so. You can’t achieve shit without authoritarianism anyways! Even if you can achieve things without authority, words are inherently meaningless symbols for meanings which are constantly in flux, so who can really say where authoritarianism begins and ends. Either way, you’re wrong and also an ILLITERATE LIAR who I will accuse of being a lib for good measure” Then I seriously doubt: I’ve read more than my fair share of theory over the years. Maybe another comrade is more patient. I'll see myself out permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago (10 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. I don't need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren't prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. They were intelligent and visionary but ultimately flawed humans capable of mistakes. You should not treat theory as your bible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago (9 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. No U I don’t need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren’t prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. No of course you don't have to. At least have the decency to not misrepresent it. You should not treat theory as your bible. You should not view yourself as the next coming of Christ that is here to be a prophet on how to achieve a state and classless society when you haven't done your homework but still would like to talk to those that have permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children) I've tried my best to be nice and try to communicate with you through the slew of insults you just keep hurling, but I have a limit. At the end of the day, you're acting like nothing but a bully. Solidarity forever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (4 children) Bruh we can all see you were an asshole the whole time lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -7 points 5 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (2 children) No, you're an asshole because you're being smug, rude and passive aggressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -10 points 5 months ago (1 child) And the people who I was replying to, doesn't that make them assholes, too? They were more smug, more rude, more aggressive than I was, by far. Does your criticism apply to them, also, or only to the one person you disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago* (2 children) I can tell you're not as communist as you like to think because this is how you react to having your uninformed political notions criticized. You would never survive a regular organizing discussion on hexbear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -6 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yes, politely replying repeatedly while getting called a lib and being told I didn't read some text I clearly read and just being browbeat again and again is truly the pinnacle of political critique and leads to some very insightful debates. Give me a fucking break. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago politely You know other people can read your comments too, right? If this is what you consider polite then you should probably reevaluate. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Canigou@jlai.lu -12 points 5 months ago I agree wholeheartedly with you, but maybe this was exactly their point ? I hope so because, otherwise, it's a pretty narrow sighted argument... Let's give them the benefit of the doubt anyway ^^ permalink fedilink source parent [+] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 months ago looks inside It's liberalism permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 months ago* (18 children) For those that don't want to sound uneducated like @bearboiblake@pawb.social https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1872/10/authority.htm permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 18 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -12 points 5 months ago* (17 children) Thank you for sharing! Do you realize that what you shared doesn't argue that Marxism-Leninism is not authoritarian, but instead just reframes it as necessarily authoritarian? As in, it implies authoritarianism is necessary to achieve communism. Argue that it is good, necessary, be my guest, but it is authoritarian. I will leave you with an excerpt from the writing you shared which resonated with me deeply, and highlights essentially the root issue I have with MLs: A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 months ago (15 children) You didn't read the text, I can tell. Do you realize that what you shared doesn’t argue that Marxism-Leninism is not authoritarian, Duh, because we have a different understanding of authority. but instead just reframes it as necessarily authoritarian? As in, it implies authoritarianism is necessary to achieve communism. Argue that it is good, necessary, be my guest, but it is authoritarian. No, the text asks if organisation in the most abstract sense is possible without authority and highlights that with the advent of capitalism labour is a highly socialized process. It argues that authority in a socialist society takes on a different form. the root issue I have with MLs The root issue I have with libs is that they think you can simply vote capitalism away, when it's been demonstrated time and time again that you cant permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -16 points 5 months ago (14 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago* (13 children) I don't read and understand theory. I call anything I don't like authoritarian repeating imperialist propaganda blindly Ok stay ignorant permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -16 points 5 months ago (12 children) Comrade, I think you have confused me for an enemy. MLs have a pretty decent argument that a transitional state is necessary to achieve communism. I understand all of that, and I've read more than my fair share of theory over the years. Just because someone disagrees with you, it does not mean that they are stupid, not reading, ignorant, etc. That is an extremely reactionary approach to criticism which prevents you from ever having to have your viewpoints truly challenged. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago (11 children) I'm willing to be less antagonist in my responses, but yours make it very difficult to do so. I don't like wasting my energy on confidently wrong libs that misrepresent what is trying to be said in this community. When you misrepresent and think what is being said is: Marxism-Leninism isn’t authoritarian! It isn’t authoritarian because I said so. You can’t achieve shit without authoritarianism anyways! Even if you can achieve things without authority, words are inherently meaningless symbols for meanings which are constantly in flux, so who can really say where authoritarianism begins and ends. Either way, you’re wrong and also an ILLITERATE LIAR who I will accuse of being a lib for good measure” Then I seriously doubt: I’ve read more than my fair share of theory over the years. Maybe another comrade is more patient. I'll see myself out permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago (10 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. I don't need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren't prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. They were intelligent and visionary but ultimately flawed humans capable of mistakes. You should not treat theory as your bible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago (9 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. No U I don’t need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren’t prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. No of course you don't have to. At least have the decency to not misrepresent it. You should not treat theory as your bible. You should not view yourself as the next coming of Christ that is here to be a prophet on how to achieve a state and classless society when you haven't done your homework but still would like to talk to those that have permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children) I've tried my best to be nice and try to communicate with you through the slew of insults you just keep hurling, but I have a limit. At the end of the day, you're acting like nothing but a bully. Solidarity forever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (4 children) Bruh we can all see you were an asshole the whole time lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -7 points 5 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (2 children) No, you're an asshole because you're being smug, rude and passive aggressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -10 points 5 months ago (1 child) And the people who I was replying to, doesn't that make them assholes, too? They were more smug, more rude, more aggressive than I was, by far. Does your criticism apply to them, also, or only to the one person you disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago* (2 children) I can tell you're not as communist as you like to think because this is how you react to having your uninformed political notions criticized. You would never survive a regular organizing discussion on hexbear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -6 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yes, politely replying repeatedly while getting called a lib and being told I didn't read some text I clearly read and just being browbeat again and again is truly the pinnacle of political critique and leads to some very insightful debates. Give me a fucking break. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago politely You know other people can read your comments too, right? If this is what you consider polite then you should probably reevaluate. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Canigou@jlai.lu -12 points 5 months ago I agree wholeheartedly with you, but maybe this was exactly their point ? I hope so because, otherwise, it's a pretty narrow sighted argument... Let's give them the benefit of the doubt anyway ^^ permalink fedilink source parent
[+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -12 points 5 months ago* (17 children) Thank you for sharing! Do you realize that what you shared doesn't argue that Marxism-Leninism is not authoritarian, but instead just reframes it as necessarily authoritarian? As in, it implies authoritarianism is necessary to achieve communism. Argue that it is good, necessary, be my guest, but it is authoritarian. I will leave you with an excerpt from the writing you shared which resonated with me deeply, and highlights essentially the root issue I have with MLs: A revolution is certainly the most authoritarian thing there is; it is the act whereby one part of the population imposes its will upon the other part by means of rifles, bayonets and cannon permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 months ago (15 children) You didn't read the text, I can tell. Do you realize that what you shared doesn’t argue that Marxism-Leninism is not authoritarian, Duh, because we have a different understanding of authority. but instead just reframes it as necessarily authoritarian? As in, it implies authoritarianism is necessary to achieve communism. Argue that it is good, necessary, be my guest, but it is authoritarian. No, the text asks if organisation in the most abstract sense is possible without authority and highlights that with the advent of capitalism labour is a highly socialized process. It argues that authority in a socialist society takes on a different form. the root issue I have with MLs The root issue I have with libs is that they think you can simply vote capitalism away, when it's been demonstrated time and time again that you cant permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -16 points 5 months ago (14 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago* (13 children) I don't read and understand theory. I call anything I don't like authoritarian repeating imperialist propaganda blindly Ok stay ignorant permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -16 points 5 months ago (12 children) Comrade, I think you have confused me for an enemy. MLs have a pretty decent argument that a transitional state is necessary to achieve communism. I understand all of that, and I've read more than my fair share of theory over the years. Just because someone disagrees with you, it does not mean that they are stupid, not reading, ignorant, etc. That is an extremely reactionary approach to criticism which prevents you from ever having to have your viewpoints truly challenged. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago (11 children) I'm willing to be less antagonist in my responses, but yours make it very difficult to do so. I don't like wasting my energy on confidently wrong libs that misrepresent what is trying to be said in this community. When you misrepresent and think what is being said is: Marxism-Leninism isn’t authoritarian! It isn’t authoritarian because I said so. You can’t achieve shit without authoritarianism anyways! Even if you can achieve things without authority, words are inherently meaningless symbols for meanings which are constantly in flux, so who can really say where authoritarianism begins and ends. Either way, you’re wrong and also an ILLITERATE LIAR who I will accuse of being a lib for good measure” Then I seriously doubt: I’ve read more than my fair share of theory over the years. Maybe another comrade is more patient. I'll see myself out permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago (10 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. I don't need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren't prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. They were intelligent and visionary but ultimately flawed humans capable of mistakes. You should not treat theory as your bible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago (9 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. No U I don’t need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren’t prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. No of course you don't have to. At least have the decency to not misrepresent it. You should not treat theory as your bible. You should not view yourself as the next coming of Christ that is here to be a prophet on how to achieve a state and classless society when you haven't done your homework but still would like to talk to those that have permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children) I've tried my best to be nice and try to communicate with you through the slew of insults you just keep hurling, but I have a limit. At the end of the day, you're acting like nothing but a bully. Solidarity forever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (4 children) Bruh we can all see you were an asshole the whole time lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -7 points 5 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (2 children) No, you're an asshole because you're being smug, rude and passive aggressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -10 points 5 months ago (1 child) And the people who I was replying to, doesn't that make them assholes, too? They were more smug, more rude, more aggressive than I was, by far. Does your criticism apply to them, also, or only to the one person you disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago* (2 children) I can tell you're not as communist as you like to think because this is how you react to having your uninformed political notions criticized. You would never survive a regular organizing discussion on hexbear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -6 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yes, politely replying repeatedly while getting called a lib and being told I didn't read some text I clearly read and just being browbeat again and again is truly the pinnacle of political critique and leads to some very insightful debates. Give me a fucking break. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago politely You know other people can read your comments too, right? If this is what you consider polite then you should probably reevaluate. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Canigou@jlai.lu -12 points 5 months ago I agree wholeheartedly with you, but maybe this was exactly their point ? I hope so because, otherwise, it's a pretty narrow sighted argument... Let's give them the benefit of the doubt anyway ^^ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 months ago (15 children) You didn't read the text, I can tell. Do you realize that what you shared doesn’t argue that Marxism-Leninism is not authoritarian, Duh, because we have a different understanding of authority. but instead just reframes it as necessarily authoritarian? As in, it implies authoritarianism is necessary to achieve communism. Argue that it is good, necessary, be my guest, but it is authoritarian. No, the text asks if organisation in the most abstract sense is possible without authority and highlights that with the advent of capitalism labour is a highly socialized process. It argues that authority in a socialist society takes on a different form. the root issue I have with MLs The root issue I have with libs is that they think you can simply vote capitalism away, when it's been demonstrated time and time again that you cant permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -16 points 5 months ago (14 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago* (13 children) I don't read and understand theory. I call anything I don't like authoritarian repeating imperialist propaganda blindly Ok stay ignorant permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -16 points 5 months ago (12 children) Comrade, I think you have confused me for an enemy. MLs have a pretty decent argument that a transitional state is necessary to achieve communism. I understand all of that, and I've read more than my fair share of theory over the years. Just because someone disagrees with you, it does not mean that they are stupid, not reading, ignorant, etc. That is an extremely reactionary approach to criticism which prevents you from ever having to have your viewpoints truly challenged. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago (11 children) I'm willing to be less antagonist in my responses, but yours make it very difficult to do so. I don't like wasting my energy on confidently wrong libs that misrepresent what is trying to be said in this community. When you misrepresent and think what is being said is: Marxism-Leninism isn’t authoritarian! It isn’t authoritarian because I said so. You can’t achieve shit without authoritarianism anyways! Even if you can achieve things without authority, words are inherently meaningless symbols for meanings which are constantly in flux, so who can really say where authoritarianism begins and ends. Either way, you’re wrong and also an ILLITERATE LIAR who I will accuse of being a lib for good measure” Then I seriously doubt: I’ve read more than my fair share of theory over the years. Maybe another comrade is more patient. I'll see myself out permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago (10 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. I don't need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren't prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. They were intelligent and visionary but ultimately flawed humans capable of mistakes. You should not treat theory as your bible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago (9 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. No U I don’t need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren’t prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. No of course you don't have to. At least have the decency to not misrepresent it. You should not treat theory as your bible. You should not view yourself as the next coming of Christ that is here to be a prophet on how to achieve a state and classless society when you haven't done your homework but still would like to talk to those that have permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children) I've tried my best to be nice and try to communicate with you through the slew of insults you just keep hurling, but I have a limit. At the end of the day, you're acting like nothing but a bully. Solidarity forever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (4 children) Bruh we can all see you were an asshole the whole time lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -7 points 5 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (2 children) No, you're an asshole because you're being smug, rude and passive aggressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -10 points 5 months ago (1 child) And the people who I was replying to, doesn't that make them assholes, too? They were more smug, more rude, more aggressive than I was, by far. Does your criticism apply to them, also, or only to the one person you disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago* (2 children) I can tell you're not as communist as you like to think because this is how you react to having your uninformed political notions criticized. You would never survive a regular organizing discussion on hexbear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -6 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yes, politely replying repeatedly while getting called a lib and being told I didn't read some text I clearly read and just being browbeat again and again is truly the pinnacle of political critique and leads to some very insightful debates. Give me a fucking break. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago politely You know other people can read your comments too, right? If this is what you consider polite then you should probably reevaluate. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -16 points 5 months ago (14 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago* (13 children) I don't read and understand theory. I call anything I don't like authoritarian repeating imperialist propaganda blindly Ok stay ignorant permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -16 points 5 months ago (12 children) Comrade, I think you have confused me for an enemy. MLs have a pretty decent argument that a transitional state is necessary to achieve communism. I understand all of that, and I've read more than my fair share of theory over the years. Just because someone disagrees with you, it does not mean that they are stupid, not reading, ignorant, etc. That is an extremely reactionary approach to criticism which prevents you from ever having to have your viewpoints truly challenged. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago (11 children) I'm willing to be less antagonist in my responses, but yours make it very difficult to do so. I don't like wasting my energy on confidently wrong libs that misrepresent what is trying to be said in this community. When you misrepresent and think what is being said is: Marxism-Leninism isn’t authoritarian! It isn’t authoritarian because I said so. You can’t achieve shit without authoritarianism anyways! Even if you can achieve things without authority, words are inherently meaningless symbols for meanings which are constantly in flux, so who can really say where authoritarianism begins and ends. Either way, you’re wrong and also an ILLITERATE LIAR who I will accuse of being a lib for good measure” Then I seriously doubt: I’ve read more than my fair share of theory over the years. Maybe another comrade is more patient. I'll see myself out permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago (10 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. I don't need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren't prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. They were intelligent and visionary but ultimately flawed humans capable of mistakes. You should not treat theory as your bible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago (9 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. No U I don’t need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren’t prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. No of course you don't have to. At least have the decency to not misrepresent it. You should not treat theory as your bible. You should not view yourself as the next coming of Christ that is here to be a prophet on how to achieve a state and classless society when you haven't done your homework but still would like to talk to those that have permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children) I've tried my best to be nice and try to communicate with you through the slew of insults you just keep hurling, but I have a limit. At the end of the day, you're acting like nothing but a bully. Solidarity forever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (4 children) Bruh we can all see you were an asshole the whole time lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -7 points 5 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (2 children) No, you're an asshole because you're being smug, rude and passive aggressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -10 points 5 months ago (1 child) And the people who I was replying to, doesn't that make them assholes, too? They were more smug, more rude, more aggressive than I was, by far. Does your criticism apply to them, also, or only to the one person you disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago* (2 children) I can tell you're not as communist as you like to think because this is how you react to having your uninformed political notions criticized. You would never survive a regular organizing discussion on hexbear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -6 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yes, politely replying repeatedly while getting called a lib and being told I didn't read some text I clearly read and just being browbeat again and again is truly the pinnacle of political critique and leads to some very insightful debates. Give me a fucking break. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago politely You know other people can read your comments too, right? If this is what you consider polite then you should probably reevaluate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago* (13 children) I don't read and understand theory. I call anything I don't like authoritarian repeating imperialist propaganda blindly Ok stay ignorant permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -16 points 5 months ago (12 children) Comrade, I think you have confused me for an enemy. MLs have a pretty decent argument that a transitional state is necessary to achieve communism. I understand all of that, and I've read more than my fair share of theory over the years. Just because someone disagrees with you, it does not mean that they are stupid, not reading, ignorant, etc. That is an extremely reactionary approach to criticism which prevents you from ever having to have your viewpoints truly challenged. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago (11 children) I'm willing to be less antagonist in my responses, but yours make it very difficult to do so. I don't like wasting my energy on confidently wrong libs that misrepresent what is trying to be said in this community. When you misrepresent and think what is being said is: Marxism-Leninism isn’t authoritarian! It isn’t authoritarian because I said so. You can’t achieve shit without authoritarianism anyways! Even if you can achieve things without authority, words are inherently meaningless symbols for meanings which are constantly in flux, so who can really say where authoritarianism begins and ends. Either way, you’re wrong and also an ILLITERATE LIAR who I will accuse of being a lib for good measure” Then I seriously doubt: I’ve read more than my fair share of theory over the years. Maybe another comrade is more patient. I'll see myself out permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago (10 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. I don't need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren't prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. They were intelligent and visionary but ultimately flawed humans capable of mistakes. You should not treat theory as your bible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago (9 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. No U I don’t need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren’t prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. No of course you don't have to. At least have the decency to not misrepresent it. You should not treat theory as your bible. You should not view yourself as the next coming of Christ that is here to be a prophet on how to achieve a state and classless society when you haven't done your homework but still would like to talk to those that have permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children) I've tried my best to be nice and try to communicate with you through the slew of insults you just keep hurling, but I have a limit. At the end of the day, you're acting like nothing but a bully. Solidarity forever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (4 children) Bruh we can all see you were an asshole the whole time lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -7 points 5 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (2 children) No, you're an asshole because you're being smug, rude and passive aggressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -10 points 5 months ago (1 child) And the people who I was replying to, doesn't that make them assholes, too? They were more smug, more rude, more aggressive than I was, by far. Does your criticism apply to them, also, or only to the one person you disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago* (2 children) I can tell you're not as communist as you like to think because this is how you react to having your uninformed political notions criticized. You would never survive a regular organizing discussion on hexbear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -6 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yes, politely replying repeatedly while getting called a lib and being told I didn't read some text I clearly read and just being browbeat again and again is truly the pinnacle of political critique and leads to some very insightful debates. Give me a fucking break. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago politely You know other people can read your comments too, right? If this is what you consider polite then you should probably reevaluate. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -16 points 5 months ago (12 children) Comrade, I think you have confused me for an enemy. MLs have a pretty decent argument that a transitional state is necessary to achieve communism. I understand all of that, and I've read more than my fair share of theory over the years. Just because someone disagrees with you, it does not mean that they are stupid, not reading, ignorant, etc. That is an extremely reactionary approach to criticism which prevents you from ever having to have your viewpoints truly challenged. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago (11 children) I'm willing to be less antagonist in my responses, but yours make it very difficult to do so. I don't like wasting my energy on confidently wrong libs that misrepresent what is trying to be said in this community. When you misrepresent and think what is being said is: Marxism-Leninism isn’t authoritarian! It isn’t authoritarian because I said so. You can’t achieve shit without authoritarianism anyways! Even if you can achieve things without authority, words are inherently meaningless symbols for meanings which are constantly in flux, so who can really say where authoritarianism begins and ends. Either way, you’re wrong and also an ILLITERATE LIAR who I will accuse of being a lib for good measure” Then I seriously doubt: I’ve read more than my fair share of theory over the years. Maybe another comrade is more patient. I'll see myself out permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago (10 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. I don't need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren't prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. They were intelligent and visionary but ultimately flawed humans capable of mistakes. You should not treat theory as your bible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago (9 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. No U I don’t need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren’t prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. No of course you don't have to. At least have the decency to not misrepresent it. You should not treat theory as your bible. You should not view yourself as the next coming of Christ that is here to be a prophet on how to achieve a state and classless society when you haven't done your homework but still would like to talk to those that have permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children) I've tried my best to be nice and try to communicate with you through the slew of insults you just keep hurling, but I have a limit. At the end of the day, you're acting like nothing but a bully. Solidarity forever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (4 children) Bruh we can all see you were an asshole the whole time lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -7 points 5 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (2 children) No, you're an asshole because you're being smug, rude and passive aggressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -10 points 5 months ago (1 child) And the people who I was replying to, doesn't that make them assholes, too? They were more smug, more rude, more aggressive than I was, by far. Does your criticism apply to them, also, or only to the one person you disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago* (2 children) I can tell you're not as communist as you like to think because this is how you react to having your uninformed political notions criticized. You would never survive a regular organizing discussion on hexbear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -6 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yes, politely replying repeatedly while getting called a lib and being told I didn't read some text I clearly read and just being browbeat again and again is truly the pinnacle of political critique and leads to some very insightful debates. Give me a fucking break. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago politely You know other people can read your comments too, right? If this is what you consider polite then you should probably reevaluate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 20 points 5 months ago (11 children) I'm willing to be less antagonist in my responses, but yours make it very difficult to do so. I don't like wasting my energy on confidently wrong libs that misrepresent what is trying to be said in this community. When you misrepresent and think what is being said is: Marxism-Leninism isn’t authoritarian! It isn’t authoritarian because I said so. You can’t achieve shit without authoritarianism anyways! Even if you can achieve things without authority, words are inherently meaningless symbols for meanings which are constantly in flux, so who can really say where authoritarianism begins and ends. Either way, you’re wrong and also an ILLITERATE LIAR who I will accuse of being a lib for good measure” Then I seriously doubt: I’ve read more than my fair share of theory over the years. Maybe another comrade is more patient. I'll see myself out permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago (10 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. I don't need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren't prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. They were intelligent and visionary but ultimately flawed humans capable of mistakes. You should not treat theory as your bible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago (9 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. No U I don’t need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren’t prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. No of course you don't have to. At least have the decency to not misrepresent it. You should not treat theory as your bible. You should not view yourself as the next coming of Christ that is here to be a prophet on how to achieve a state and classless society when you haven't done your homework but still would like to talk to those that have permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children) I've tried my best to be nice and try to communicate with you through the slew of insults you just keep hurling, but I have a limit. At the end of the day, you're acting like nothing but a bully. Solidarity forever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (4 children) Bruh we can all see you were an asshole the whole time lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -7 points 5 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (2 children) No, you're an asshole because you're being smug, rude and passive aggressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -10 points 5 months ago (1 child) And the people who I was replying to, doesn't that make them assholes, too? They were more smug, more rude, more aggressive than I was, by far. Does your criticism apply to them, also, or only to the one person you disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago* (2 children) I can tell you're not as communist as you like to think because this is how you react to having your uninformed political notions criticized. You would never survive a regular organizing discussion on hexbear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -6 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yes, politely replying repeatedly while getting called a lib and being told I didn't read some text I clearly read and just being browbeat again and again is truly the pinnacle of political critique and leads to some very insightful debates. Give me a fucking break. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago politely You know other people can read your comments too, right? If this is what you consider polite then you should probably reevaluate. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago (10 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. I don't need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren't prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. They were intelligent and visionary but ultimately flawed humans capable of mistakes. You should not treat theory as your bible. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago (9 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. No U I don’t need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren’t prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. No of course you don't have to. At least have the decency to not misrepresent it. You should not treat theory as your bible. You should not view yourself as the next coming of Christ that is here to be a prophet on how to achieve a state and classless society when you haven't done your homework but still would like to talk to those that have permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children) I've tried my best to be nice and try to communicate with you through the slew of insults you just keep hurling, but I have a limit. At the end of the day, you're acting like nothing but a bully. Solidarity forever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (4 children) Bruh we can all see you were an asshole the whole time lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -7 points 5 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (2 children) No, you're an asshole because you're being smug, rude and passive aggressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -10 points 5 months ago (1 child) And the people who I was replying to, doesn't that make them assholes, too? They were more smug, more rude, more aggressive than I was, by far. Does your criticism apply to them, also, or only to the one person you disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago* (2 children) I can tell you're not as communist as you like to think because this is how you react to having your uninformed political notions criticized. You would never survive a regular organizing discussion on hexbear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -6 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yes, politely replying repeatedly while getting called a lib and being told I didn't read some text I clearly read and just being browbeat again and again is truly the pinnacle of political critique and leads to some very insightful debates. Give me a fucking break. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago politely You know other people can read your comments too, right? If this is what you consider polite then you should probably reevaluate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 months ago (9 children) You are relentlessly behaving in a very chauvinistic and reactionary way. No U I don’t need to agree with every word Engels wrote to be a communist. Marx, Engels, et al. aren’t prophets sharing mystical secrets from on high. No of course you don't have to. At least have the decency to not misrepresent it. You should not treat theory as your bible. You should not view yourself as the next coming of Christ that is here to be a prophet on how to achieve a state and classless society when you haven't done your homework but still would like to talk to those that have permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children) I've tried my best to be nice and try to communicate with you through the slew of insults you just keep hurling, but I have a limit. At the end of the day, you're acting like nothing but a bully. Solidarity forever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (4 children) Bruh we can all see you were an asshole the whole time lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -7 points 5 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (2 children) No, you're an asshole because you're being smug, rude and passive aggressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -10 points 5 months ago (1 child) And the people who I was replying to, doesn't that make them assholes, too? They were more smug, more rude, more aggressive than I was, by far. Does your criticism apply to them, also, or only to the one person you disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago* (2 children) I can tell you're not as communist as you like to think because this is how you react to having your uninformed political notions criticized. You would never survive a regular organizing discussion on hexbear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -6 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yes, politely replying repeatedly while getting called a lib and being told I didn't read some text I clearly read and just being browbeat again and again is truly the pinnacle of political critique and leads to some very insightful debates. Give me a fucking break. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago politely You know other people can read your comments too, right? If this is what you consider polite then you should probably reevaluate. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children) I've tried my best to be nice and try to communicate with you through the slew of insults you just keep hurling, but I have a limit. At the end of the day, you're acting like nothing but a bully. Solidarity forever. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (4 children) Bruh we can all see you were an asshole the whole time lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -7 points 5 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (2 children) No, you're an asshole because you're being smug, rude and passive aggressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -10 points 5 months ago (1 child) And the people who I was replying to, doesn't that make them assholes, too? They were more smug, more rude, more aggressive than I was, by far. Does your criticism apply to them, also, or only to the one person you disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago* (2 children) I can tell you're not as communist as you like to think because this is how you react to having your uninformed political notions criticized. You would never survive a regular organizing discussion on hexbear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -6 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yes, politely replying repeatedly while getting called a lib and being told I didn't read some text I clearly read and just being browbeat again and again is truly the pinnacle of political critique and leads to some very insightful debates. Give me a fucking break. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago politely You know other people can read your comments too, right? If this is what you consider polite then you should probably reevaluate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (4 children) Bruh we can all see you were an asshole the whole time lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -7 points 5 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (2 children) No, you're an asshole because you're being smug, rude and passive aggressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -10 points 5 months ago (1 child) And the people who I was replying to, doesn't that make them assholes, too? They were more smug, more rude, more aggressive than I was, by far. Does your criticism apply to them, also, or only to the one person you disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent
[+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -7 points 5 months ago* (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (2 children) No, you're an asshole because you're being smug, rude and passive aggressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -10 points 5 months ago (1 child) And the people who I was replying to, doesn't that make them assholes, too? They were more smug, more rude, more aggressive than I was, by far. Does your criticism apply to them, also, or only to the one person you disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent
[–] orc_princess@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago (2 children) No, you're an asshole because you're being smug, rude and passive aggressive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -10 points 5 months ago (1 child) And the people who I was replying to, doesn't that make them assholes, too? They were more smug, more rude, more aggressive than I was, by far. Does your criticism apply to them, also, or only to the one person you disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent
[+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -10 points 5 months ago (1 child) And the people who I was replying to, doesn't that make them assholes, too? They were more smug, more rude, more aggressive than I was, by far. Does your criticism apply to them, also, or only to the one person you disagree with? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 5 months ago Your first comment in the thread was already smug and passive aggressive. LMAO permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago* (2 children) I can tell you're not as communist as you like to think because this is how you react to having your uninformed political notions criticized. You would never survive a regular organizing discussion on hexbear. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -6 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yes, politely replying repeatedly while getting called a lib and being told I didn't read some text I clearly read and just being browbeat again and again is truly the pinnacle of political critique and leads to some very insightful debates. Give me a fucking break. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago politely You know other people can read your comments too, right? If this is what you consider polite then you should probably reevaluate. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] bearboiblake@pawb.social -6 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yes, politely replying repeatedly while getting called a lib and being told I didn't read some text I clearly read and just being browbeat again and again is truly the pinnacle of political critique and leads to some very insightful debates. Give me a fucking break. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago politely You know other people can read your comments too, right? If this is what you consider polite then you should probably reevaluate. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 months ago politely You know other people can read your comments too, right? If this is what you consider polite then you should probably reevaluate. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Canigou@jlai.lu -12 points 5 months ago I agree wholeheartedly with you, but maybe this was exactly their point ? I hope so because, otherwise, it's a pretty narrow sighted argument... Let's give them the benefit of the doubt anyway ^^ permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 months ago looks inside It's liberalism permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 months ago looks inside It's liberalism permalink fedilink source parent
