182
Thunderbird Team Unveils Thunderbolt Self-Hostable AI Client (linuxiac.com)
submitted 4 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
77 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I am tired boss...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 4 months ago* (8 children)

Facedeer, if you don't want people to see you as a troll, don't complain about "apocalyptic" rhetoric around AI job loss one day, then say people are in "denial" if they don't believe it the next day.

In other words, don't be a troll.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    In other words, "don't have an opinion about AI that's different from mine."

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    Facedeer, posting two contradictory things is not "having an opinon." It is trolling.

    You should try having an opinion, and even sticking to the topic (addressing Mozilla's waste instead of bloviating about some vague virtue of the right to speech ). It would be so much more interesting.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    What's contradictory? A lot of people in that thread about AI capabilities were in denial. A lot of other people are making apocalyptic statements.

    See that "other people" thing? Different people have different opinions and react differently. That's the point I'm making here, too. Not everyone hates this AI tool that Mozilla has put out.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    FaceDeer, don't act dumb. You clearly went into both threads to attack and name-call anybody who doesn't criticize AI under your ill-defined, ever-shifting standards. So your attacks ended up contradictory and hypocritical.

    And now you're here to defend Mozilla waste by suggesting there are people who totally wanted it. (Are they in the room with you right now?)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    And now you're here to defend Mozilla waste by suggesting there are people who totally wanted it. (Are they in the room with you right now?)

    FauxLiving, harmburgler, Avid Amoeba, and CyberSeeker are discussing it in positive terms elsewhere in this very thread. 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘 had a more cautiously open view. So yes, they are in the "room" with us right now.

    Since you care about upvotes, note that many of my comments here have garnered a decent number of those too.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    You ignored the first half of my statement. Noted.

    To the second half: show me where they asked Mozilla to spend money on it before Mozilla did. Otherwise you misinterpreted what I wrote.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I ignored the first half of your statement because it was just pointless badmouthing of me.

    I'm ignoring the rest of your comment because it's a weird goalpost shift. Why would Mozilla ask a bunch of random people on the Fediverse what they want? You're upset because they didn't personally ask you what to do?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    You can't name anyone who asked for this thing that Mozilla is burning money on? Noted.

    Don't be so quick to confidently name names, then. Including with the weird "karma" accusation you tried throwing at me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent