125
Doctors Remove Woman’s Brain Implant Against Her Will (futurism.com)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/science@beehaw.org
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 years ago* (2 children)

One of the articles suggests that the device was removed because the batteries were no longer available and nearing end of life.

Regardless, a surgeon is only going to maintain devices approved by the FDA or cleared for investigational use. If the company goes bankrupt then both are no longer the case.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Sounds like an FDA and battery standards problem then.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

    There's another article that explains that it wasn't just the battery. After the company went under, there was nobody who could provide support for the product in the event of malfunction. Removal was recommended as the safest course.

    This isn't an "FDA problem". The device was investigational, which means it did not have final FDA approval. Consequently, there is no guarantee that a surgeon would have the knowledge to maintain it. Surgeons are not expected to be familiar with every experimental device, in fact most surgeons will never touch any experimental device.

    And no, surgeons aren't just going to read a bunch of documentation to get up to speed. Typically, when a new product launches the manufacturer will send their technical representatives into the operating room to help troubleshoot any issues.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent