you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 3 years ago

The articles point out the company went bankrupt and her doctors advised her to remove the implant. It says she was willing to pay to keep it, and suggests this could have been avoided if another company could have taken over device maintainance.

All of which suggests that the device was removed because it could no longer be maintained, despite her willingness to pay.

  • source
  • parent