you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

having seen the film -- the story is amazing, but I can't imagine how an IMAX version would improve it

it was a film driven by its story and characters. rarely did its visuals even matter at all. I could have watched the film with my eyes closed and missed very little.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    C'mon, the puppetry and the practical effects looked fantastic. Even the special effects, grounded in real in-camera tricks, were visually stunning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    No lie, but 100% of that film was in the storytelling. It was a pretty movie, but it could easily have been a radio play.

    That’s why it was such a good book

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I agree, for this type of sci-fi film it actually looks a bit cheap and green screeny in places.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    I think the movie improved on the books by having some neat visuals. I enjoyed it but I still think it was Andy Weir's weakest book.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Didn't have the same feeling, but I started with Hail Mary and when trying to go back to read The Martian it was rather painful. Haven't read his other works yet so guess I'll see how it pans out.

  • source
  • parent