▲ 852 ▼ fixed cyberghost's "meme" (thelemmy.club) submitted 3 years ago by Vuraniute to c/memes@lemmy.ml 921 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (14 children) Neither did you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 10 points 3 years ago (8 children) I clearly did, but by all means, go with "no u" and see how convincing it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (7 children) You attributed some failed strategy to me and then accused me of purity testing states that are only aesthetically socialist. That response had nothing to do with what I said. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 7 points 3 years ago (6 children) You attributed the failed strategy to yourself, and I accused you of it because that's exactly what you were doing. That's a response, to your comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (5 children) As you yourself said: it's untainted by existing practice, there is no existing strategy as in its new. In relation to the numerous failed attempts at socialism through dictatorship it's better to try something new and not keep shooting the working class in the foot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 8 points 3 years ago (4 children) Ok, so what is your new strategy then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (3 children) Currently our group has been working on raising avereness of unions since there are a lot of white collar workers that aren't a member of any union. We are also trying to popularise the coop business model especially in the public sector. We are also advocating for wealth redistribution reforms. The USSR kinda ruined calling yourself a socialist(And calling yourself a communist here will more likely get you punched here) so a lot of advocacy has been about pushing for socialist ideas with different wording. For more long term we are hoping to get unions more involved in government and possibly form a worker's party with the union members. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 3 points 3 years ago (2 children) Ok, that's all well and good, but nothing new, so what's the new strategy you mentioned? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) The workers party we are forming will be domocratic with no strongman. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago Ok, but what's the new strategy? permalink fedilink source parent [–] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (4 children) Hexbear users don't operate in good faith so no point in actually trying to engage them in good faith. They will wear you out if you do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 9 points 3 years ago (3 children) We engage in good faith only so long as we are met with good faith, if you aren't going to respect us we have no reason to respect you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) Well as long as you have a sub dedicated to "dunking on libs" we both know that is not true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 7 points 3 years ago Hey now, the dunk tank is also for chuds permalink fedilink source parent [–] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 4 points 3 years ago Just stop being a lib and be a communist. It’s one quick trick hexbears don’t want you to know permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 10 points 3 years ago (8 children) I clearly did, but by all means, go with "no u" and see how convincing it is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (7 children) You attributed some failed strategy to me and then accused me of purity testing states that are only aesthetically socialist. That response had nothing to do with what I said. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 7 points 3 years ago (6 children) You attributed the failed strategy to yourself, and I accused you of it because that's exactly what you were doing. That's a response, to your comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (5 children) As you yourself said: it's untainted by existing practice, there is no existing strategy as in its new. In relation to the numerous failed attempts at socialism through dictatorship it's better to try something new and not keep shooting the working class in the foot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 8 points 3 years ago (4 children) Ok, so what is your new strategy then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (3 children) Currently our group has been working on raising avereness of unions since there are a lot of white collar workers that aren't a member of any union. We are also trying to popularise the coop business model especially in the public sector. We are also advocating for wealth redistribution reforms. The USSR kinda ruined calling yourself a socialist(And calling yourself a communist here will more likely get you punched here) so a lot of advocacy has been about pushing for socialist ideas with different wording. For more long term we are hoping to get unions more involved in government and possibly form a worker's party with the union members. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 3 points 3 years ago (2 children) Ok, that's all well and good, but nothing new, so what's the new strategy you mentioned? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) The workers party we are forming will be domocratic with no strongman. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago Ok, but what's the new strategy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (7 children) You attributed some failed strategy to me and then accused me of purity testing states that are only aesthetically socialist. That response had nothing to do with what I said. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 7 points 3 years ago (6 children) You attributed the failed strategy to yourself, and I accused you of it because that's exactly what you were doing. That's a response, to your comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (5 children) As you yourself said: it's untainted by existing practice, there is no existing strategy as in its new. In relation to the numerous failed attempts at socialism through dictatorship it's better to try something new and not keep shooting the working class in the foot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 8 points 3 years ago (4 children) Ok, so what is your new strategy then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (3 children) Currently our group has been working on raising avereness of unions since there are a lot of white collar workers that aren't a member of any union. We are also trying to popularise the coop business model especially in the public sector. We are also advocating for wealth redistribution reforms. The USSR kinda ruined calling yourself a socialist(And calling yourself a communist here will more likely get you punched here) so a lot of advocacy has been about pushing for socialist ideas with different wording. For more long term we are hoping to get unions more involved in government and possibly form a worker's party with the union members. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 3 points 3 years ago (2 children) Ok, that's all well and good, but nothing new, so what's the new strategy you mentioned? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) The workers party we are forming will be domocratic with no strongman. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago Ok, but what's the new strategy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 7 points 3 years ago (6 children) You attributed the failed strategy to yourself, and I accused you of it because that's exactly what you were doing. That's a response, to your comment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (5 children) As you yourself said: it's untainted by existing practice, there is no existing strategy as in its new. In relation to the numerous failed attempts at socialism through dictatorship it's better to try something new and not keep shooting the working class in the foot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 8 points 3 years ago (4 children) Ok, so what is your new strategy then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (3 children) Currently our group has been working on raising avereness of unions since there are a lot of white collar workers that aren't a member of any union. We are also trying to popularise the coop business model especially in the public sector. We are also advocating for wealth redistribution reforms. The USSR kinda ruined calling yourself a socialist(And calling yourself a communist here will more likely get you punched here) so a lot of advocacy has been about pushing for socialist ideas with different wording. For more long term we are hoping to get unions more involved in government and possibly form a worker's party with the union members. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 3 points 3 years ago (2 children) Ok, that's all well and good, but nothing new, so what's the new strategy you mentioned? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) The workers party we are forming will be domocratic with no strongman. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago Ok, but what's the new strategy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (5 children) As you yourself said: it's untainted by existing practice, there is no existing strategy as in its new. In relation to the numerous failed attempts at socialism through dictatorship it's better to try something new and not keep shooting the working class in the foot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 8 points 3 years ago (4 children) Ok, so what is your new strategy then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (3 children) Currently our group has been working on raising avereness of unions since there are a lot of white collar workers that aren't a member of any union. We are also trying to popularise the coop business model especially in the public sector. We are also advocating for wealth redistribution reforms. The USSR kinda ruined calling yourself a socialist(And calling yourself a communist here will more likely get you punched here) so a lot of advocacy has been about pushing for socialist ideas with different wording. For more long term we are hoping to get unions more involved in government and possibly form a worker's party with the union members. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 3 points 3 years ago (2 children) Ok, that's all well and good, but nothing new, so what's the new strategy you mentioned? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) The workers party we are forming will be domocratic with no strongman. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago Ok, but what's the new strategy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 8 points 3 years ago (4 children) Ok, so what is your new strategy then? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (3 children) Currently our group has been working on raising avereness of unions since there are a lot of white collar workers that aren't a member of any union. We are also trying to popularise the coop business model especially in the public sector. We are also advocating for wealth redistribution reforms. The USSR kinda ruined calling yourself a socialist(And calling yourself a communist here will more likely get you punched here) so a lot of advocacy has been about pushing for socialist ideas with different wording. For more long term we are hoping to get unions more involved in government and possibly form a worker's party with the union members. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 3 points 3 years ago (2 children) Ok, that's all well and good, but nothing new, so what's the new strategy you mentioned? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) The workers party we are forming will be domocratic with no strongman. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago Ok, but what's the new strategy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 1 point 3 years ago* (3 children) Currently our group has been working on raising avereness of unions since there are a lot of white collar workers that aren't a member of any union. We are also trying to popularise the coop business model especially in the public sector. We are also advocating for wealth redistribution reforms. The USSR kinda ruined calling yourself a socialist(And calling yourself a communist here will more likely get you punched here) so a lot of advocacy has been about pushing for socialist ideas with different wording. For more long term we are hoping to get unions more involved in government and possibly form a worker's party with the union members. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 3 points 3 years ago (2 children) Ok, that's all well and good, but nothing new, so what's the new strategy you mentioned? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) The workers party we are forming will be domocratic with no strongman. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago Ok, but what's the new strategy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 3 points 3 years ago (2 children) Ok, that's all well and good, but nothing new, so what's the new strategy you mentioned? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) The workers party we are forming will be domocratic with no strongman. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago Ok, but what's the new strategy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 0 points 3 years ago (1 child) The workers party we are forming will be domocratic with no strongman. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago Ok, but what's the new strategy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brain_in_a_box@hexbear.net 2 points 3 years ago Ok, but what's the new strategy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (4 children) Hexbear users don't operate in good faith so no point in actually trying to engage them in good faith. They will wear you out if you do. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 9 points 3 years ago (3 children) We engage in good faith only so long as we are met with good faith, if you aren't going to respect us we have no reason to respect you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) Well as long as you have a sub dedicated to "dunking on libs" we both know that is not true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 7 points 3 years ago Hey now, the dunk tank is also for chuds permalink fedilink source parent [–] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 4 points 3 years ago Just stop being a lib and be a communist. It’s one quick trick hexbears don’t want you to know permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 9 points 3 years ago (3 children) We engage in good faith only so long as we are met with good faith, if you aren't going to respect us we have no reason to respect you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) Well as long as you have a sub dedicated to "dunking on libs" we both know that is not true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 7 points 3 years ago Hey now, the dunk tank is also for chuds permalink fedilink source parent [–] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 4 points 3 years ago Just stop being a lib and be a communist. It’s one quick trick hexbears don’t want you to know permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (2 children) Well as long as you have a sub dedicated to "dunking on libs" we both know that is not true. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 7 points 3 years ago Hey now, the dunk tank is also for chuds permalink fedilink source parent [–] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 4 points 3 years ago Just stop being a lib and be a communist. It’s one quick trick hexbears don’t want you to know permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ElChapoDeChapo@hexbear.net 7 points 3 years ago Hey now, the dunk tank is also for chuds permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 4 points 3 years ago Just stop being a lib and be a communist. It’s one quick trick hexbears don’t want you to know permalink fedilink source parent
