you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 41 points 5 months ago (20 children)

Even in pre-history, men were somehow convinced that what women really wanted was: bigger dicks. Bigger dicks than human men could possibly offer.

It's such a weird preoccupation, and it seems like it's got to be deeper than just a cultural thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 5 months ago (14 children)

    I wouldn't call 600BC prehistoric.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 5 months ago (13 children)

    Depends on who your authority is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 5 months ago (12 children)

    Since we have a written record, it's clearly history, accuracy disclaimers aside.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    To a lot of people, religious texts are authority

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Why did you switch to the word Authority instead of History? Is it because using the word history makes your argument invalid?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

    I don't even have an argument here. Chill.

    You must be so used to people being contrarian that even my sarcastic criticism triggers your aggression or whatever this is.

    Just relax and take a deep breath, nobody here is an enemy.

    I'm merely pointing out an interesting idea that to a lot of (maybe even most, or even all) people, history, and therefore one's worldview and values, are subjective and based around an authority of some kind.

    No need to make this weirdly personal and hostile, we are only discussing ideas.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Wow you're coming off as super chill and not defensive at all here. Lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    There's been a lot of strange needless hostility around here lately so maybe we move on?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    By saying that some people have different beliefs as to when "history" starts for different people?

    Edit: if you really aren't fucking with me, I think there genuinely might be a miscommunication here. And maybe I'm missing insulting or wronging somebody. Can you clarify when you think I started it?

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -9 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    written record, it’s clearly history, accuracy disclaimers aside.

    With that definition, isn't Frodo dumping the One Ring into a vulcano history too?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Well obviously there’s a biological and psychological component, which would transcend cultures. Probably goes back to times in our evolution before we were even considered human.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

    That would explain its robustness across culture and history, but I can’t come up with even a shitty evopsych explanation. Bigger dicks scoop out more of the previous male’s ejaculate??

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Same reason oral sex probably predates modern humans. Pleasing your partner is advantageous. Whether the bigger dick actually does this is a matter of perception. Just like in modern porn.

  • source
  • parent