125
Doctors Remove Woman’s Brain Implant Against Her Will (futurism.com)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/science@beehaw.org
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 3 years ago (5 children)

Yeah I don't think this is a coding issue. This is something on your brain and if the hardware requires maintenance you better have qualified surgeons that know and understand the device. Of that's no longer possible because the producer no longer exists then it's maybe not a bad idea to have it removed, depending on some factors of course like "how long does she have left to live" and "how much does she suffer.eithout the device".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (4 children)

    Why would a medical device exist such that even with documentation a surgeon unaffiliated with the company cannot safely interact with it? You would think it would be a design priority for any maintenance to be straightforward and with clear instructions. I have a hard time imagining that the problem here is anything other than proprietary information being tied up in red tape.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    FDA approval is contingent on so many factors that even if it was entirely open source, including all hardware design and the instructions for assembly, maintenance, and manufature it would be entirely plausible for it to lose approval if the company responsible for continued development went bankrupt.

    Without approval, no reputable surgeon will do anything beyond remove it.

    A device not having a clear and unambiguously documented path for addressing defects found in the future is more than sufficient reason to lose approval.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Without approval, no reputable surgeon will do anything beyond remove it.

    That's fucked up then

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    I guess I don't see how a surgeon being unwilling to do maintenance on a non-FDA approved medical device is fucked up.
    If it fails to meet the criteria for being safely used in a medical context, it's irresponsible to try to maintain it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    Oh I agree with you, but that requires laws being written correctly. Healthcare being what it is currently in the USA, I very much believe that the women was better off with the device removed.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent