Rare Usa-China w.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

What initiated this discussion was someone saying no other system made sense, I explained why it does, the sense just isn't there in english.

Other languages have a distinct category for the ground level that separates it from the rest of the building and I’m saying I don’t think that’s necessary or very useful.

This is the monolingual part lol. Language isn't constructed around productivity or specific usecases.

but it’s not a deficiency of english that we wouldn’t say “a one story building doesn’t have any levels”.

This reads like you're going angery about me calling english silly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    A lot of the discussion in this thread should really be clarified whether it’s english specific, or trying to cover everyone.

    I’m not trying to argue languages should be changed based on usefulness, but that english not having a ground level distinction is not a problem. The ‘floor’ double meaning is silly, but I was pushing back on it needing to have a word for elevated levels.

    One system for the entire world wouldn’t work unless the way we talk about floor numbers were as decoupled from language as phone numbers, but as long as I can still mock the british I’m good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments