Taken from the CompTIA IT Fundamentals Exam Guide book (2nd edition, published 2021). I'm not sure if they fixed this in newer versions, if at all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 3 years ago* (10 children)

I mean, it's technically correct? The G does stand for GNU, and GNU tools can be used to build Linux. It is indeed worded very badly.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    No, that's a big confusion.

    I hate the RMS rant about how you're supposed to say "GNU/Linux", but here we're talking about a GNU package that can be used without Linux. It's on FreeBSD and even macOS.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    No basically all Linux uses gnu Coreurils as a foundation and is therefore best called gnu+Linux. There’s a great RMS rant about this , it’s what the title is referring to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Aren't their embedded systems that run the Linux kernel without the core-utils (maybe with busybox instead) and would therefore be non-gnu linux variants?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments