▲ 590 ▼ There is no ethical consumption of HBO’s Harry Potter series (www.theverge.com) submitted 5 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 141 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 27 points 5 months ago (3 children) Money. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago (2 children) but that excuse doesnt hold water either, why spend money on a remake when you can make money on a quick and easy and CHEAP remaster/re-release without any effort or inevitable backlash around casting choices permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 child) Remasters rarely make money. The Blu-ray remaster of Star Trek (can't remember which series) lost money. No one would buy a re-release of a decade old Harry Potter film. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] egg82@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was 2001, 25 years ago. Deathly Hallows was 2011, 15 years ago. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago (2 children) but that excuse doesnt hold water either, why spend money on a remake when you can make money on a quick and easy and CHEAP remaster/re-release without any effort or inevitable backlash around casting choices permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 child) Remasters rarely make money. The Blu-ray remaster of Star Trek (can't remember which series) lost money. No one would buy a re-release of a decade old Harry Potter film. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] egg82@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was 2001, 25 years ago. Deathly Hallows was 2011, 15 years ago. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 child) Remasters rarely make money. The Blu-ray remaster of Star Trek (can't remember which series) lost money. No one would buy a re-release of a decade old Harry Potter film. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] egg82@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was 2001, 25 years ago. Deathly Hallows was 2011, 15 years ago. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] egg82@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone was 2001, 25 years ago. Deathly Hallows was 2011, 15 years ago. permalink fedilink source parent