Boots on the ground or TACO as usual?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but I thought the main point of the strait closure was to put pressure on the US and Israel to stop with their aggression, so if they do stop with their aggression, the strait can be opened again. Of course, Iran would not agree to characterizing it as a concession, but the western media establishment can just claim that it's Iran lying to save face when really it's the west doing so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    At this point Iran's demands are for a complete US withdrawal from the region, because they have object permanence and know that an agreement to simply stop the active conflict is inherently temporary and will be broken again essentially at random.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Iran's cost benefit ratio is like 1:100, nobody is going to stop blowing up US military equipment when you have an opportunity like that, plus everything they destroy now can't be used in the next air strike or ground invasion or naval blockade. Also the US lies so the next ceasefire is probably an assassination attempt anyways.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment