443
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
443 points (97.4% liked)
Not The Onion
22159 readers
495 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Why was he let go with so many priors?
Ethical catch and release
What? Is he too small?
Arrested != convicted
If someone managed to get arrested so many times without getting a conviction the one or other time, it would be a cause for a harrasment claim against the police.
I mean, in some areas they just throw you in the holding cell until you sober up, which would be an arrest. Dude probably knows someone in the system.
Every layer of the legal system is broken, and lots of people benefit from not fixing it.
Why should he be locked up just because of a bunch of stupid laws?
Maybe I'm just insane, but I think that laws making it illegal to be on meth while driving are reasonable. That's just me though.
Because the law is still valid? If you consider the law stupid, do something against it.
I personally don't consider it stupid to forbid driving under influence, regardless of the means.
Are you asking me or telling me? Because either way no it isn't. Laws are bullshit and you should break them just on principle.
Sorry, all of them? You don't think that sometimes, it's good for some things to not be allowed?
does it not "being allowed" mean it won't happen?
In the case of this gentleman, I suppose not. However, I believe that driving after consuming drugs that impede your ability to drive should have a punishment of some kind. It is a matter of public safety. It's irresponsible to drink and drive, it's irresponsible to be on heroin while driving.
Agreed. But it should be your own morality that prevents that. A law shouldn't even be something you consider when making the decision not to.
It should be one's own morality, yes. But I find it rather obvious that many individuals lack sufficient morality to act in the interest of others. Laws, and the punishments for breaking those laws, are supposedly meant to force the actions of the immoral to align with that of the moral as far as public safety is concerned. Of course, this is only true when the laws are just, but the prevention of people driving while high is a worthwhile goal, and it is reasonable to punish those that partake in methamphetamines while operating a large hunk of metal that can easily kill people.