▲ 477 ▼ Squirrels are ‘vaping’ e-cigarettes after mistaking fruity aromas for food (nypost.com) submitted 5 months ago by mudkip@lemdro.id to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world 131 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 7 points 5 months ago (3 children) It's a meta study, and 7 studies is more than sufficient to establish statistical significance. There's also no issue with the study titles. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Would you like to pick which of those seven studies was most correlated and effective at proving OP point? permalink fedilink source parent [–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) Really? Ones about women vaping on opioids. Two of them were about dual users of cigarettes and ecigarettes. None of them came close to correlating with OP‘s statement. would you like to summarize those seven studies with me and see if there’s any relationship in there? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I already told you I'm no longer engaging with your exponential growth comment method. Fuck off. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Yea I bet lmao thats actually what I was hoping to obtain. Shut the fuck up if you don't have anything valuable to add. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago I gotta be honest with you chief if I was a scientist, trying to establish a point. And I had the choice between a meta-analysis and running an actual study….. I would run a study and not a meta analysis. For only the fact that he examined 87 studies and could barely find 7 to use for his analysis. The bar for scientific publishing is in hell. But hey look at the audience. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Would you like to pick which of those seven studies was most correlated and effective at proving OP point? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 child) Really? Ones about women vaping on opioids. Two of them were about dual users of cigarettes and ecigarettes. None of them came close to correlating with OP‘s statement. would you like to summarize those seven studies with me and see if there’s any relationship in there? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I already told you I'm no longer engaging with your exponential growth comment method. Fuck off. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Yea I bet lmao thats actually what I was hoping to obtain. Shut the fuck up if you don't have anything valuable to add. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 point 5 months ago (1 child) I already told you I'm no longer engaging with your exponential growth comment method. Fuck off. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Yea I bet lmao thats actually what I was hoping to obtain. Shut the fuck up if you don't have anything valuable to add. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Yea I bet lmao thats actually what I was hoping to obtain. Shut the fuck up if you don't have anything valuable to add. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago I gotta be honest with you chief if I was a scientist, trying to establish a point. And I had the choice between a meta-analysis and running an actual study….. I would run a study and not a meta analysis. For only the fact that he examined 87 studies and could barely find 7 to use for his analysis. The bar for scientific publishing is in hell. But hey look at the audience. permalink fedilink source parent