you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    then if it could be left blank or not a verifiable date… it would not comply with the law making its existence…. worthless. unless it is to make it mandatory in the future

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    The law said the OS must have a method to enter an age at account creation and an API for applications to query it. The systemd PR satisfies that, so the SPI and anyone representing a distro that uses systemd is off the hook legally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    so the second step in enshitification then. seems to me nipping it in the bud seems the better play. best to just slap a “not in california” sticker on it and provide it the same as always.

    at this point i dont treat peoples invocation of the slippery slope fallacy as coherent or honest based on historical evidence

  • source
  • parent