151
Memes and Violent Posts (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 months ago by [M] to c/pics@lemmy.world
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

We have been seeing a big influx of memes and non Pic posts. This is a reminder that this community is meant for Pics which is just that - pictures taken with a camera. Any non Pic posts will be taken down and frequent infracture of that rule will lead to a temp ban.

We have also been seeing an uptick on Violent posts and manifestos. This is not the community for this type of post. No violent, NSFW posts are allowed. These will lead to an immediate temp ban. I understand with tensions today that people are rightfully upset about society, but there are other communities that allow such posts.

Any questions feel free to reply to this post or DM me. Happy posting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -9 points 6 months ago (11 children)

Picture doesn't mean photograph. The word picture predates the invention of the camera. That's why the word photograph was created in the first place, to differentiate it from other types of pictures. A photo is what comes from a camera, a picture basically means any kind of image. An image of JUST text probably doesn't qualify as a picture, but pretty much every other image does.

If a person wants to just see photographs then I'm sure there are plenty of c/photos communities for that.

But with that said, this community isn't c/memes or c/socialposts either, so a nuanced bit of a moderation hand could certainly be warranted.

And with that also said, moderators can do whatever they want with their own communities. So if you wanted to limit it to like just text posts instead of any pics then that would be up to you to decide too

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/picture

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 19 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    No need for the pedantry. But yes this is very much needed. This community has been a bit chaotic recently.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [+] -11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    It's not pedantry, it's a massive difference in moderation direction from what you said.

    I only view my main feed so i don't pay attention to what post is in what community, but i believe you that a new moderation direction may be needed. But it also sounds like you're talking about trying to steer it into an extremely narrow alley which isn't valid to the title of the community. c/photos is for only photographs, but c/pics means it's for way more than just photos.

    You have the ability to restrict it to just photos of feet if you wanted to, but imo that also wouldn't be valid.

    I'm glad you're moderating out violent posts though

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 11 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    Please refer to the rules. Nothing has changed just reiterating what the rules are here and how enforcement will be approached.

    And it is indeed pedantry.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    IRL, a picture doesn't have to be a photograph. But see Rule 3? Any time you go to the Sidebar to create a post, there it is looking right at you. Here, I've copied and pasted it for you.

    Rules:

    1… Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you’re the photographer

    2…Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

    3… Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

    4… No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

    5… Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

    Photo of the Week Rule(s):

    1… On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week’s banner and featured photo.

    2… The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [+] -12 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Well sure, a moderator can write whatever they want in the sidebar, that doesn't mean it makes any sense. If you like you can create a c/catpics and then put a rule in the sidebar saying we allow all content except for pictures of cats. Just because you CAN do that doesn't mean it makes sense to

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Dude it's the rules. If you don't like them, make your own community. If you want them to be changed, be forthright about it and maybe make a meta discussion about it once to get a feel for it.

    If you wanna post in this community, you need to follow the rules. It's actually pretty simple.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [+] -7 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    You clearly didn't read what i wrote. I said multiple times almost exactly what you just wrote.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Your first comment went way into the weeds of specific rule applications. But the rules are vague because a lot of Lemmy is based on the spirit of the rules and not the exact language, specifically so that we can be more tolerant and lenient.

    And in your second post you were implying the rules of this community don't make sense. I told you it's the rules, and if they don't make sense to you you are free to make your own community.

    You told me I didn't read your comments but you also told me that you said exactly what I said. Either that's wrong, or there's no reason for that comment.

    I would be more chill about this but the whole thread is littered with underhanded attacks against the mods and this community and I question your motives.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Dude, y so serious. Do you need me to quote some of the multiple times where i said basically "the rule doesn't make sense but the mod can do whatever they like"?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    I'm so serious because you are implying that I'm either stupid or that I have ulterior motives by saying I didn't read your comments, which I evidently did.

    Also "but the mod can do whatever they like" is nowhere to be found in your previous comments so don't act like you were being respectful about this. In fact, you questioned their whole ruleset. Nothing chill about that and nothing to indicate good faith engagement.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent