why do so many people seem to have a hierarchy allergy round these Western leftist parts

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 7 months ago (10 children)

Quick surface analysis answer about this in the western world: We've never had good leaders or benefited from the system, so anarchism is the go to response. In the underdeveloped world, MLM is popular because they've had good leaders do good things for them.

I feel that it may be wise of us to consider that the anti-hierarchical points of anarchism may be a good thing to pursue in the imperial core. I often wonder if this is what is required to break the back of the social indoctrination of capital.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    I've organized in imperial core for a long time, average people really want hierarchy. Most people don't want to make decisions, they just want to be told how they can help. They don't want to have meetings, debates, or spend really any time thinking about things. They want to show up, be told what to do, and go about their day after

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    I can honestly empathize with that. I don't want to deal with all the shit going on in the world either. But I've seen it pop up here and there that (apparently there's some research?) anarchism is more popular in leftist circles in the west.

    If that's true, I'd hazard a guess that a combination of what I first posted and newer converts responding based more in anger and a desire burn it all down.

    Otherwise, could be CIA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    I think anarchism is popular in the west because of anti communism, which anarchism has historically been a part of. It has been allowed to proliferate as controlled opposition, because it is historically ineffective. They know people will radicalize here and there and they need there to be an option that allows for a semblance of radicalization without producing anything that will actually challenge the status quo. Growing up in the west, you see punks and anarchists in media, but the only time communism is brought up is during school when you are told it is evil and they move on.

    In the end, when people start to radicalize or seek out sub culture because they are naturally feeling against the mainstream, the only real option you've ever heard of that hasn't been totally demonized is anarchism. Anarchism in the west doesn't require any hard work and is mostly focused on hanging out with people, partying, music shows, so it is comfortable and easy for individualist westerners to adopt and not really have to change much

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I see your point, but I disagree on it not being effective or that they don't work hard at things. It hasn't properly overthrown the order of course, but I see a lot of mutual aid work in anarchist groups. That itself is some powerful propaganda to get people thinking of alternative ways of functioning. And if you learn about real anarchist theory, you will inevitably learn Marxism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I'm saying it doesn't require hard work. People can just adopt anarchism without having to change much at all. You don't have to read much, study at all, etc. of course people do that within anarchism but there are plenty of anarchists who think reading itself is bourgeois, literally.

    I'll also say that, having worked in anarchist mutual aid spaces for a long time, people are burning themselves out doing "hard work" but not accomplishing much. I think this is by design, because these groups reject structure and material analysis, they do things in ways that exhaust resources quickly to produce worse results. I've seen countless regular people see how anarchists are operating their mutual aid programs and say "ew get me out of here " because of how poorly run and low quality they were. Rotting food and volunteers who are drunk or high, allowing abusers to be around because there is no system to get rid of them, general unprofessional behavior that makes average people unable to trust them.

    To your last part, the most anti-marxist people I interact with regularly are the most well studied anarchists I know. They've read all the anarchist lit which is why they feel confident rejecting Marxism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)