298
Pam Bondi subpoenaed by US House in Jeffrey Epstein investigation
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
298 points (99.3% liked)
The Trump-Epstein Files™
1117 readers
34 users here now
We keep track of the release of the files, but also to explore what’s already available, and why – with enough exposure – this could bring the man down, and who knows even his regime or the empire.
Want to start digging yourself? Check out our sticky post
Our Rules
(Subject to Change)
- #1 Be kind: keep it civil and amicable. The enemy is not in this community but in Palaces, The White House and penthouses.
- #2 Trigger Warnings: required. Mark posts which may be triggering to read or see for victims of sexual abuse with "[TW]" in front of your post title. If you're posting an image or video with explicit thumbnail, you will have to set the entire post as NSFW AND include the TW.
- #3 Cite sources: preferably direct link to the article/pdf and or an archive link in case there is a paywalled. In the article find a relevant few paragraphs and quote them in your post.
- #4 Post the Bates numbers: when referencing evidence (even if it is mentioned in an article), please post
- the Bates number of the file you’re referring to (EFTA00000000)
- a link to the original source
- a link to a mirror of the file in case DOJ pulls the file.
- #5 include key paragraphs: when posting articles, include a few key paragraphs of the article (not the entire article)
- #6 avoid links to social media as sources. Links to twitter must use xcancel.com.
Our Justice System
- First offence: warning + 2 day ban
- Second offence: 7 day ban
- Third offence: permanent ban from community
- Creating multiple accounts to interact with this community: permanent ban for all accounts in community + report to your instance admin.
This community is run by volunteers so please don't test the justice system, as with all justice systems it is critically underfunded.
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
I don't think Republican congresscritters are suddenly growing a spine or developing a conscience -- I think they're concerned about the midterms.
The vast, vast majority of voters want the Epstein files fully released and the perpetrators punished. Any congressman whose voting record shows that they're against this happening is going to have a difficult time in the midterm elections. So they're scrambling to do some performative nonsense to show that they're on the 'right side' of this. But nothing of actual substance will come of it if they can help it.
However, this might still be an exploitable opportunity. They really don't want their name next to a recorded 'no' vote on anything that would force release of the files. So Dems need to be pushing hard to hold votes on these topics and soon, before the midterms. Because after the midterms, I bet a lot of these Republicans are going to go right back to their obstructionist ways.
Absolutely. I hope I didn't convey that I think they're doing it out of conscience. I think they're doing it because they know they are fucking LOATHED, and some of them may even be starting to understand the changing proximity of pitchforks.
There is no doubt whatsoever they'd be shoving this back in the congressional closets if they could.