And I responded to that with the list of arguments that the duck might call itself whatever it wants but it's still the same capitalistic duck (gig economy, 996, almost no proletariat in NPC - like 10% now? 15%?). No socialist country can be ruled by beurocracy or bourgeoisie. You ignored that and instead wrote this shit:
China is already socialist, it isn’t going to become socialist because it already is. China has worker protections, and the lives of the working classes have been improving year over year.
As if this is requirement to being a socialist country. If it is, then half of EU fits, including Poland.
Edit:
Poland dropped in quality of life for most people after the dissolution of socialism in the immediate,
Covered in another reply about Poland taking foreign debts in the 1970 and 80 and not finding new creditors in the 1990.
and in the long run the poor in Poland are worse off than they were in socialism.
To which you gave no indicators. Poverty rates are lower than in the 80s (from your sources). Life expectancy is higher. Median wealth is vastly higher.