Apparently this will include Linux...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 7 months ago (5 children)

The law is not for the individual person, but for organisations that develop the OS. So they would go to Arch linux org and start threatening them with huge fines, unless they do something here. And all the headache of how exactly to implement this would fall on arch developers. At which point I suspect they would go the same route as Midnight BSD and just forbid the use in California, because as you rightly said it is impossible to implement age verification in DIY distro.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)

    Blocking use in California is definitely the only way forward. This is not practical to implement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    They'll just do it everywhere else. What is the privacy distro that runs on USB that you just carry around? TailsOS or some such? You can just use it anywhere but since it's different than a live boot I guess you can have all the rest of your personal stuff in there too. Black market for tails OS USBs, or really, just use a VPS somewhere else or a VPN or just go out of state for a few minutes and buy a dumb phone for downloading whatever you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    They'll just do it everywhere else.

    I can't imagine this will get traction in the EU where I am. Sometimes the decisions made here are actually thought through lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments