you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -3 points 3 years ago (4 children)

I swear you lot saw one 15 minute video made by some 17 year old about how nuclear is safe and now you just spout the same 3 or points over and over again without any critical understanding.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    I love how this person made a good argument about energy storage and you just responded with speculation and an insult, not actually addressing the point. If it's the same 3 points, you should be able to perfectly counter their argument without resorting to an ad hominem attack.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    and ive made that response dozens of time before. Hence why im making that comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Or you don't actually have an argument and are posturing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago

    Well for one he's implying chemical batteries are the only way to store energy, which is disingenuous and not a good argument, pumped storage is a proven, relatively cheap and widely known technology. and then the whole "BaSeLoAd" argument which is just literally just a bullshit buzzword the fossil fuel industry uses to try and make renewables seem less reliable.

    So please wont you forgive me for not engaging the guy spewing bad faith arguments and ff propaganda.

  • source
  • parent