There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -5 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (9 children)

Nuclear has never been good, just an "oh shit, we left it too late".

Nuclear will be good when there is no wind, at night, with limited hydro and storage. The excitement with it has been from years of industry astroturfing. Seeing reddit go from opposed to, celebrating nuclear as thinking it was superior to all other renewables was a wild ride.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 years ago (7 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    False. Solar PV, hydro and wind are superior without the nuclear waste problem.

    Nuclear has a purpose in the mix, but more in a supporting role.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (5 children)

    The nuclear waste problem's solution is stick it in the side of a mountain in the middle of nowhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    In good environmentally friendly concrete. So greeen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    What do you think hydroelectric dams get built with?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments