So I never saw Sinners, but if the movie explores that, and I don't know how it does, then I think I'd side with not censoring it because of that. I think obviously someone goes up to the duo to explain and apologize and it seems that what the center of the controversy is. In my mind censoring-not censoring is secondary and the headline that centralizes the illness seems mortifying if I were in his shoes. I know "Half-hearted apology after awkward moment" isn't good input for the outrage machine, but that's what the situation should be. If someone on crutches fell onto the red carpet while you're walking, you wouldn't be like "you asshole!" This should be the kind of embarrassing that he should talk about in a stand up comedy routine, not blasting him into the news.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
replies: