▲ 276 ▼ The Mullvad ad that was banned in the UK (media.mullvad.net) submitted 6 months ago* by artyom@piefed.social to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 comments fedilink hide all child comments https://mullvad.net/en/and-then/uk
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 41 points 6 months ago (3 children) tooo large! Resized to 360p: permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 6 months ago (1 child) 360p is too much. Do thecodec for the Nintendo 3DS, that goes on a 224p screen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 4 points 6 months ago donate here, so I can afford a dedicated FFMPEG server. permalink fedilink source parent [–] artyom@piefed.social [S] 2 points 6 months ago Thanks, I'm not a web wizard and didn't want to upload it on piefed servers. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Psythik@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago (2 children) A video file can never be too large. The more bits dedicated to image quality, the better. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Havatra@lemmy.zip 23 points 6 months ago (1 child) When there's no particular need of high definition (nothing here that is small or hard to see, nor particularly pleasing aesthetics), the gains from a big file falls away. And the upsides of a smaller video is that people with poor internet speeds can stream it more easily, and it takes less space on the servers (which are not free to run here on the fediverse). Worth a smaller file size imho permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nikelui@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago Absolutely. Unpopular opinion maybe, but any resolution larger than 720p is wasted on a laptop monitor and any resolution larger than 1080p is wasted on anything that is not a movie theater. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 6 months ago (1 child) Let us know how the MOV runs on your Amiga⸮🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Don't be ridiculous. MOV is an inefficient, out of date format. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 6 months ago … why are you telling me for‽ mullvad published in that container format. I encode VP8+OPUS ?h×640w. R U 👌? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 6 months ago (1 child) 360p is too much. Do thecodec for the Nintendo 3DS, that goes on a 224p screen. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 4 points 6 months ago donate here, so I can afford a dedicated FFMPEG server. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 4 points 6 months ago donate here, so I can afford a dedicated FFMPEG server. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] artyom@piefed.social [S] 2 points 6 months ago Thanks, I'm not a web wizard and didn't want to upload it on piefed servers. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world -4 points 6 months ago (2 children) A video file can never be too large. The more bits dedicated to image quality, the better. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Havatra@lemmy.zip 23 points 6 months ago (1 child) When there's no particular need of high definition (nothing here that is small or hard to see, nor particularly pleasing aesthetics), the gains from a big file falls away. And the upsides of a smaller video is that people with poor internet speeds can stream it more easily, and it takes less space on the servers (which are not free to run here on the fediverse). Worth a smaller file size imho permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nikelui@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago Absolutely. Unpopular opinion maybe, but any resolution larger than 720p is wasted on a laptop monitor and any resolution larger than 1080p is wasted on anything that is not a movie theater. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 6 months ago (1 child) Let us know how the MOV runs on your Amiga⸮🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Don't be ridiculous. MOV is an inefficient, out of date format. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 6 months ago … why are you telling me for‽ mullvad published in that container format. I encode VP8+OPUS ?h×640w. R U 👌? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Havatra@lemmy.zip 23 points 6 months ago (1 child) When there's no particular need of high definition (nothing here that is small or hard to see, nor particularly pleasing aesthetics), the gains from a big file falls away. And the upsides of a smaller video is that people with poor internet speeds can stream it more easily, and it takes less space on the servers (which are not free to run here on the fediverse). Worth a smaller file size imho permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nikelui@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago Absolutely. Unpopular opinion maybe, but any resolution larger than 720p is wasted on a laptop monitor and any resolution larger than 1080p is wasted on anything that is not a movie theater. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nikelui@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago Absolutely. Unpopular opinion maybe, but any resolution larger than 720p is wasted on a laptop monitor and any resolution larger than 1080p is wasted on anything that is not a movie theater. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 6 months ago (1 child) Let us know how the MOV runs on your Amiga⸮🙄 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Don't be ridiculous. MOV is an inefficient, out of date format. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 6 months ago … why are you telling me for‽ mullvad published in that container format. I encode VP8+OPUS ?h×640w. R U 👌? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 point 6 months ago (1 child) Don't be ridiculous. MOV is an inefficient, out of date format. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 6 months ago … why are you telling me for‽ mullvad published in that container format. I encode VP8+OPUS ?h×640w. R U 👌? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 point 6 months ago … why are you telling me for‽ mullvad published in that container format. I encode VP8+OPUS ?h×640w. R U 👌? permalink fedilink source parent