you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 160 points 7 months ago (11 children)

There is zero chance this is true.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 76 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Probably just lying to their boss. I have an AI obsessed boss and regularly lie about how much I use it because productivity is actually measured entirely by their perception of you and not by any real metric.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 7 months ago

    I've tried explaining this to me peers that just quietly bust their asses while noisy jerks (including me, but to a lesser extent than most) get perceived as high performers because they engage with their bosses and work on things that have high visibility.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    And their bosses are just lying to their bosses, and it's lying and yessing all up and down the line, and the rest of us out here just have to live with whatever The Machine pukes out for us.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Truth no longer matters to these clowns. Who cares about it's true? Who cares that Spotify is already good... And the one thing they can do to is make it worse?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, I wonder about this often: the product is finished; aside from curation, what else does it need?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago

    It’s probably true.

    Think of it with this alternate headline:

    Spotify reclassifies what constitutes a good developer

    And no doubt, they’re capturing what these “good developers” do to better train the clanker to make the “bad developers” redundant.

  • source
  • parent