661
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rljkeimig@lemmy.world 117 points 1 week ago

It appears they are using the barrel of the rifle to break the window, which is even sillier than the other thing.

[-] Carmakazi@piefed.social 51 points 1 week ago

Barrel/muzzle device = steel, buttstock is usually plastic nowadays, not the dumbest thing I've seen these goons do. Muzzle strikes are a thing in long arm combatives.

Probably should have used an actual tool for it, though. And maybe not gangster-gripping the rifle to get a downward trajectory of the round for safety (I am being really, really generous here).

[-] rljkeimig@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

More it seems unsafe than damaging to the rifle, but I guess they don't care about that anyway?

[-] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 63 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Very fucking unsafe to drive the muzzle of your rifle into any rigid object. Muzzle strikes are a thing. However you target the soft tissue of an assailant that has gotten within grabbing distance of your weapon and you do not want to kill them.

What this asshole did is dangerous on many fronts. They're using what appears to be their suppressor, which is atleast an 8" lever, that's likely screwed into an adapter that's then screwed onto the barrel. It's as much of a rube goldberg setup as it sounds. However under normal wear and tear still usually robust. It's designed to be used in tension to suppress the muzzle flash and report of a fired round by slowing and cooling the resulting gasses.

What it's not designed to be used as, is a FUCKING HAMMER, which puts it in compression. This asshole is striking a hard surface, with a steel blunt tube, comprised of a very complicated inner geometry. Not only that but he's striking at an angle levering the wide and rigid tube against a narrow coupler. I see a baffle strike and a ruined suppressor in his future. Possibly a ruined barrel crown depending on how much he just fucking bent that shit.

Now, to the biomechanics of what is happening. He had his hand on the pistol grip and his support hand on the foregrip. There's no fucking leverage there he can meaningfully exert. There's a reason spears don't have pistol grips. So the hand around the pistol grip is going to try to get the most purchase on the weapon. Which means it'll be riding up to the upper of the weapon and on the way there it could turn the weapon safety. Also, around that pistol grip is the trigger.

The driver of that car is being terrorized, by a moron, who very easily could've had a negligent discharge and shot her.

Fucking nightmare fuel all around. Those poor women. I hope they get justice because I would've gone to jail or died if it were me recording.

[-] watson387@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago

This is an excellent commentary. Thanks!

[-] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago

Some muzzle devices are explicitly designed to shatter glass alongside normal function - although they're commonly found on breaching shotguns.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Yes but what about rule #4 of gun safety: Never point your gun at anything you don’t want a bullet hole in?

Was he ready to shoot them?

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They're always ready to shoot us the exact second they think they can get away with it.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 week ago

from ICE perspective, he's not violating that rule

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Can’t violate a law you have no respect for in the first place.

I do it all the time.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Or perhaps they could realize that honking your horn is free speech and have some sense of perspective - there should not have been an assault rifle

There are specific window-breaker muzzle attachments for this purpose. It's not what I'd use either if something without a gun mounted behind it was available though. Some eBay warrior wanted to try out their high-speed tacticool gear and got their golden opportunity.

[-] SalamenceFury@piefed.social -1 points 1 week ago

You are supposed to use your muzzle if you need to use your gun as a melee weapon. That's why bayonets exist.

[-] teft@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No. You buttstrike someone if you have no bayonet. Striking someone with the barrel is dumb because youre at least gonna fuck up your zero and you might bend the barrel which could cause a rapid unscheduled disassembly of your rifle when you fire it.

[-] SalamenceFury@piefed.social -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Military and police training literally say that if you need to melee with your gun you use a muzzle strike - it's usually reserved for someone who's actively trying to grab your gun by the barrel and you don't actually feel like using lethal force. Using a muzzle strike against a fleshy target won't do anything to the gun's zero or ability to fire, you don't do it on a hard surface like glass. Hitting someone with your stock might actually break the gun if the recoil spring goes through it.

[-] teft@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I remember my bayonet class from my time in the army. We were never taught any such thing. We were actively discouraged from hitting things with our muzzle.

What is your experience with rifle combat? Because mine is practical application in iraq.

Edit: lol love the block because you got called out. Next time don't spout off stuff you don't know about. And maybe don't accuse people of being war criminals just because you're mad about being called out for being wrong.

this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
661 points (98.8% liked)

Videos

17834 readers
156 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed
  9. AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS