450
Canada's landlords now asking a record-breaking average of $2,078 per month: rental report (www.ctvnews.ca)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/canada@lemmy.ca
137 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

According to a new report from Rentals, In July, the Canadian rental market hit a record high with an average asking rent of $2,078, marking an 8.9 per cent annual increase.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 3 years ago (3 children)

Why wouldn’t it make sense for renting to be cheaper than buying? Would I prefer to pay $3000 in rent or $3100 in mortgage+all other fees? Even though I’d be cash flow negative by $100, I am building equity. At the end of 30 years, one person owns a home and the other doesn’t, for the difference of just $100/mo.

Renting is in fact cheaper than buying in places like Vancouver, where wages are low but real estate prices are high.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    It wouldn't make sense for a property owner to charge less to rent out an apartment than they are paying to buy it, in the same way it makes no sense to buy high and sell low on the stock market.

    You need to cover your costs which includes the mortgage and maintenance fees. In the short term, those fees could be low, but when you need to get the roof or brickwork redone, suddenly you're losing money. Why would you spend money on property only to lose money on it?

    Property shouldn't be seen as a commodity, but it also shouldn't be a useless money sink. Who's going to buy anything more than a single-family home if it's just going to suck money out of you forever? There would never be any high-density housing anywhere.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 9 points 3 years ago

    No, cash flow negative does NOT mean unprofitable!

    Imagine you are a landlord that owns a $500k unit. You are renting it out for $2000, but it costs you $2001 after your mortgage, taxes, maintenance and fees. Is that worth it? Think about it this way: it costs you $1 a month to own a $500k appreciating asset. That’s a ridiculously good deal.

    The reason why it can make sense that renting is cheaper (as a monthly ongoing expense) than buying is because you get less when you rent than when you buy: when you rent you merely get the right to use the property, whereas when you buy you get the right to use the property as well as the value of the asset itself.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago

    The money you pay into a mortgage doesn't evaporate. Only a portion of your mortgage is considered a cost (interest and fees and the like) the rest goes into your home equity.

    If a tenants rent payment doesn't cover all of your mortgage, taxes and maintenance it does not mean your not making a profit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent