▲ 106 ▼ Boomer meme rule (lemmygrad.ml) submitted 3 years ago by simply_surprise@lemmygrad.ml to c/moretankie196@lemmygrad.ml 19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 3 years ago (10 children) Are you suggesting Gramsci is a bad read? permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] simply_surprise@lemmygrad.ml [S] 9 points 3 years ago* (9 children) I just reposted it 'cause I thought it seemed funny. I unfortunately don't know enough Gramsci to have an opinion! What's a good place to start? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 11 points 3 years ago (7 children) You should read Gramsci, he's definitely pretty clear on his analysis of Gramsci. His prison notebooks are all about Gramsci's ideas, so I'd recommend them if you already have some basis in reading theory permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Anuvin@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 years ago* (6 children) Gramsci is pretty clear on his analysis of Gramsci? I think maybe you meant someone else perhaps? Or maybe I am just missing something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 9 points 3 years ago (5 children) I just think his analysis speaks for itself you know. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 years ago (4 children) he's very similar to Marx in that respect, you really should just read Marx if you want to understand the works of Marx permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (3 children) Well I do think other writers can explain Marx well and Gramsci also, just that Gramsci explains Gramsci pretty well you know? It's where I'd start for Gramsci, at Gramsci explaining Gramsci (I'm just fucking around with our lemmygrad comrades) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) I have to concede that Gramsci is a pretty good scholar of Gramsci, possibly even the best due to his extreme familiarity with Gramsci's work permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* Definitely get a secondary analysis of Prison Writings. Otherwise it's a lot of trying to decipher that wordy 19th century language. That's on top of Gramsci having to use a lot of code words because he was writing it as basically a political prisoner, and had to get it past the guards and to his wife. Edit: it's called Prison Notebooks, sorry permalink fedilink source parent
[–] simply_surprise@lemmygrad.ml [S] 9 points 3 years ago* (9 children) I just reposted it 'cause I thought it seemed funny. I unfortunately don't know enough Gramsci to have an opinion! What's a good place to start? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 11 points 3 years ago (7 children) You should read Gramsci, he's definitely pretty clear on his analysis of Gramsci. His prison notebooks are all about Gramsci's ideas, so I'd recommend them if you already have some basis in reading theory permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Anuvin@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 years ago* (6 children) Gramsci is pretty clear on his analysis of Gramsci? I think maybe you meant someone else perhaps? Or maybe I am just missing something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 9 points 3 years ago (5 children) I just think his analysis speaks for itself you know. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 years ago (4 children) he's very similar to Marx in that respect, you really should just read Marx if you want to understand the works of Marx permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (3 children) Well I do think other writers can explain Marx well and Gramsci also, just that Gramsci explains Gramsci pretty well you know? It's where I'd start for Gramsci, at Gramsci explaining Gramsci (I'm just fucking around with our lemmygrad comrades) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) I have to concede that Gramsci is a pretty good scholar of Gramsci, possibly even the best due to his extreme familiarity with Gramsci's work permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 years ago permalink fedilink source parent [–] ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* Definitely get a secondary analysis of Prison Writings. Otherwise it's a lot of trying to decipher that wordy 19th century language. That's on top of Gramsci having to use a lot of code words because he was writing it as basically a political prisoner, and had to get it past the guards and to his wife. Edit: it's called Prison Notebooks, sorry permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 11 points 3 years ago (7 children) You should read Gramsci, he's definitely pretty clear on his analysis of Gramsci. His prison notebooks are all about Gramsci's ideas, so I'd recommend them if you already have some basis in reading theory permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Anuvin@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 years ago* (6 children) Gramsci is pretty clear on his analysis of Gramsci? I think maybe you meant someone else perhaps? Or maybe I am just missing something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 9 points 3 years ago (5 children) I just think his analysis speaks for itself you know. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 years ago (4 children) he's very similar to Marx in that respect, you really should just read Marx if you want to understand the works of Marx permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (3 children) Well I do think other writers can explain Marx well and Gramsci also, just that Gramsci explains Gramsci pretty well you know? It's where I'd start for Gramsci, at Gramsci explaining Gramsci (I'm just fucking around with our lemmygrad comrades) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) I have to concede that Gramsci is a pretty good scholar of Gramsci, possibly even the best due to his extreme familiarity with Gramsci's work permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 years ago permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anuvin@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 years ago* (6 children) Gramsci is pretty clear on his analysis of Gramsci? I think maybe you meant someone else perhaps? Or maybe I am just missing something. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 9 points 3 years ago (5 children) I just think his analysis speaks for itself you know. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 years ago (4 children) he's very similar to Marx in that respect, you really should just read Marx if you want to understand the works of Marx permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (3 children) Well I do think other writers can explain Marx well and Gramsci also, just that Gramsci explains Gramsci pretty well you know? It's where I'd start for Gramsci, at Gramsci explaining Gramsci (I'm just fucking around with our lemmygrad comrades) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) I have to concede that Gramsci is a pretty good scholar of Gramsci, possibly even the best due to his extreme familiarity with Gramsci's work permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 years ago permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 9 points 3 years ago (5 children) I just think his analysis speaks for itself you know. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 years ago (4 children) he's very similar to Marx in that respect, you really should just read Marx if you want to understand the works of Marx permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (3 children) Well I do think other writers can explain Marx well and Gramsci also, just that Gramsci explains Gramsci pretty well you know? It's where I'd start for Gramsci, at Gramsci explaining Gramsci (I'm just fucking around with our lemmygrad comrades) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) I have to concede that Gramsci is a pretty good scholar of Gramsci, possibly even the best due to his extreme familiarity with Gramsci's work permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 years ago permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 years ago (4 children) he's very similar to Marx in that respect, you really should just read Marx if you want to understand the works of Marx permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (3 children) Well I do think other writers can explain Marx well and Gramsci also, just that Gramsci explains Gramsci pretty well you know? It's where I'd start for Gramsci, at Gramsci explaining Gramsci (I'm just fucking around with our lemmygrad comrades) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) I have to concede that Gramsci is a pretty good scholar of Gramsci, possibly even the best due to his extreme familiarity with Gramsci's work permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 years ago permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (3 children) Well I do think other writers can explain Marx well and Gramsci also, just that Gramsci explains Gramsci pretty well you know? It's where I'd start for Gramsci, at Gramsci explaining Gramsci (I'm just fucking around with our lemmygrad comrades) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) I have to concede that Gramsci is a pretty good scholar of Gramsci, possibly even the best due to his extreme familiarity with Gramsci's work permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 years ago permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 3 years ago (2 children) I have to concede that Gramsci is a pretty good scholar of Gramsci, possibly even the best due to his extreme familiarity with Gramsci's work permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 years ago permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commiewithoutorgans@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 years ago permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* Definitely get a secondary analysis of Prison Writings. Otherwise it's a lot of trying to decipher that wordy 19th century language. That's on top of Gramsci having to use a lot of code words because he was writing it as basically a political prisoner, and had to get it past the guards and to his wife. Edit: it's called Prison Notebooks, sorry permalink fedilink source parent