197
Fun fact: you can't upload this image on piefed.social (thelemmy.club)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
177 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://codeberg.org/rimu/pyfedi/src/commit/6405e51dab23f43eaea18d0ee4d9e7a773a3fd31/app/community/forms.py#L335

deliberately misleading error message.

a white background with the words "anonymous" and "no.676767" on it in black Arial font
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 28 points 7 months ago (17 children)

... Wow. I mean I already knew there was some questionable stuff with PieFed but this is honestly next level.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (16 children)

    The blocking tool specifically? Most block functions on sites operate like Piefeds.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
    •
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (15 children)

    No just the whole thing. It seems sort of extreme to do all this stuff in the code. This is not something the software should have inbuilt if you ask me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (14 children)

    Why? Much of it is orientated around giving admins tools to deal with trolls/spammers/AI posters. An alert system.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [+] 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    This is just something piefed.social has, not all. Rimu dislikes 4chan culture heavily.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [+] 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    It can be taken out is what I mean. You are talking as if it can't.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [+] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    I feel like you're moving from moderation to sort of oppressive or authoritarian territory once you're literally building a social credit system into your software. If you want that, sure use PieFed. I don't want that, so I won't.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    So the reputation system. I'll see if Rimu can be talked into making it instance level.

    But its function is primarily to just catch out trolls and spammers. Make them more visible to admins.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    It seems the chief complaint people have about Lemmy going to Piefed are how admins operate their instances. Not sure any of this will change that, or even help.

    Not to mention all these are just a game for trolls and spammers to tool around with. Like: Up/downvotes were built before vote manipulation became a problem.

    This stuff is the difference between building a bridge and governing who crosses it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    Its not vote manipulation as such here. Its much simpler than that. Lemmy has a spam problem. People coming in to just make shill communities selling a service or product or spamming advert posts across communities.

    They usually get downvoted, but I can use Piefeds admin tools to filter for downvoted posts by new accounts. This usually catches most spammers like that. I can then ban them from piefed.social and pass that on to Lemmy admins.

    A lot of Day 1 trolls are caught like this too.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Sounds like a flood control for community creation would be appropriate.

    It used to be in the early days instances would vet users at signup. Is there no mechanism for an instance admin to do the same for the creation of a community? They just can't be vetted before creation?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    Piefed already disables community creation for out of the box accounts for a few days at least. Lemmy doesn't. That's the problem.

    Also many of these spammers just spam on other communities rather than doing it on their own.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent