1187
A real reason why Nazi-ICE is in Minnesota (thelemmy.club)
submitted 7 months ago by to c/boycottus@lemmy.ca
131 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm pretty sure that's a reference to the midterm elections in November 2026

Social media post from Senator Chris Murphy: Pam Bondi just sent a letter to Minnesota officials saying ICE will leave if the state turns over its voter database to Trump. Guess what? This has never been about safety or immigration. It's a pretext for Trump to take over elections in swing states
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 7 months ago* (5 children)

Registration streamlines voting in that you don't need to bring ID, proof of eligibility, and residency to the polling place. You just show up and they check your signature.

Party declaration determines what party's primary you can vote it. It's to prevent people from casting spoiler votes to help a weak opposition candidate win their primary. Not all states do this: some ask which ballot you want at the polling place.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)

    But...they still have to check that it's you who is showing up, so you still need an ID with photo or not?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

    You don't need ID -- they just ask you your name/address, check they have you registered, and check your signature against the one you gave when you registered to vote. If you're not registered you do need ID and proof of residence.

    The current system gives you time to gather the required documents and recourse if the local government rejects it. It limits the ability of the people at the polling to turn you away.

    It starts to make more sense when you consider all most people have are state issued IDs, combined with our political history of disenfranchisement -- particularly in the Jim Crow era.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    Why are state issued IDs a problem?

    I don't see a problem with getting a notification per mail some weeks before an election, which I then bring to the voting boot together with my ID where they check it with their list.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    Imagine you're black living in some small town in Alabama in the 60s.

    You go to vote and present your ID. The guy running the polling place takes it, looks at it, and hands it off to another "good old boy" who takes it to a back room -- presumably to destroy it. The first guy turns to you and says "You need to present your ID to vote." Indignant, you turn and see the Sheriff ... who you know is also a high ranking member of the local KKK chapter.

    You have no recourse. Even if you can prove you possess a valid ID you can't prove in court that you brought it with you that day, and multiple "witnesses" will say you didn't.

    That is a real thing that frequently happened. The current system takes that weapon away from the corrupt local governments and institutions. The most important thing it gives someone is time to seek recourse before voting day arrives: particularly a courts. And if the lower courts are corrupt the person being disenfranchised can appeal to a higher one.

    A court can determine you're eligible and order a local government to let you vote ... and anyone that violates that order is going to have a very bad time. Sheriff Dipshit knows what he can get away with, and disobeying a federal court's order isn't one of them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •