▲ 1160 ▼ They "cannot guarantee" the product description of the 1.3k dollar laptop theyre selling is accurate because they used chatgpt to write it (thelemmy.club) submitted 7 months ago by Cattail@lemmy.world to c/assholedesign@lemmy.world 157 comments fedilink hide all child comments This cannot possibly hold up in court. You cant just advertise a product and then be like "*but actually we might be lying about some or all of these things"??? What the fuck are you selling then
[–] Cattail@lemmy.world [S] 17 points 7 months ago (2 children) Sucks that the US is outlawing ai regulation permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Rooster326@programming.dev 13 points 7 months ago* This isn't an AI regulation thing. It could say this was made by a marketing fuckboy and it'd be the same. This is a consumer protection thing... permalink fedilink source parent [–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 7 months ago (1 child) The product information still needs to be accurate though. You don't need to restrict the use of AI, this falls under consumer protection. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cattail@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child) or we can simply apply false advertising if the ai gets something wrong, like how that lawyer that disbarred for using ai to write his court papers and cited a case that never happened permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago Yeah, when the other commenters mentioned consumer protection laws, they meant that it would be a case of false advertising. There's also been a similar case before, where Air Canada got sued, because their chatbot promised to a customer that he could apply for one of their bonus programs after the flight, which then got denied by Air Canada: https://www.mccarthy.ca/en/insights/blogs/techlex/moffatt-v-air-canada-misrepresentation-ai-chatbot In that particular case, it might have helped, if the chatbot had a disclaimer that it's lying, but only because Air Canada provided the truthful information elsewhere on their webpage. That's not gonna be the case for such product descriptions... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 13 points 7 months ago* This isn't an AI regulation thing. It could say this was made by a marketing fuckboy and it'd be the same. This is a consumer protection thing... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 7 months ago (1 child) The product information still needs to be accurate though. You don't need to restrict the use of AI, this falls under consumer protection. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Cattail@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child) or we can simply apply false advertising if the ai gets something wrong, like how that lawyer that disbarred for using ai to write his court papers and cited a case that never happened permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago Yeah, when the other commenters mentioned consumer protection laws, they meant that it would be a case of false advertising. There's also been a similar case before, where Air Canada got sued, because their chatbot promised to a customer that he could apply for one of their bonus programs after the flight, which then got denied by Air Canada: https://www.mccarthy.ca/en/insights/blogs/techlex/moffatt-v-air-canada-misrepresentation-ai-chatbot In that particular case, it might have helped, if the chatbot had a disclaimer that it's lying, but only because Air Canada provided the truthful information elsewhere on their webpage. That's not gonna be the case for such product descriptions... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Cattail@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child) or we can simply apply false advertising if the ai gets something wrong, like how that lawyer that disbarred for using ai to write his court papers and cited a case that never happened permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago Yeah, when the other commenters mentioned consumer protection laws, they meant that it would be a case of false advertising. There's also been a similar case before, where Air Canada got sued, because their chatbot promised to a customer that he could apply for one of their bonus programs after the flight, which then got denied by Air Canada: https://www.mccarthy.ca/en/insights/blogs/techlex/moffatt-v-air-canada-misrepresentation-ai-chatbot In that particular case, it might have helped, if the chatbot had a disclaimer that it's lying, but only because Air Canada provided the truthful information elsewhere on their webpage. That's not gonna be the case for such product descriptions... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago Yeah, when the other commenters mentioned consumer protection laws, they meant that it would be a case of false advertising. There's also been a similar case before, where Air Canada got sued, because their chatbot promised to a customer that he could apply for one of their bonus programs after the flight, which then got denied by Air Canada: https://www.mccarthy.ca/en/insights/blogs/techlex/moffatt-v-air-canada-misrepresentation-ai-chatbot In that particular case, it might have helped, if the chatbot had a disclaimer that it's lying, but only because Air Canada provided the truthful information elsewhere on their webpage. That's not gonna be the case for such product descriptions... permalink fedilink source parent