▲ 192 ▼ Hexbear, various lemmy libs want to know, do you unironically support Trump? Sorry for the tedious question and thanks if you bother to answer it lol. If you do respond please be kinda serious. (lemmy.ml) submitted 3 years ago* by mycorrhiza@lemmy.ml to c/politics@hexbear.net 462 comments fedilink hide all child comments no need to write an essay or anything some libs and baby leftists are kinda baffled by the trump banter here and don't know what's serious and what's irony
[+] kneel_before_yakub@hexbear.net 28 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 24 points 3 years ago (1 child) how about shooting them into the sun? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Indifference_Engine@hexbear.net 21 points 3 years ago (1 child) That can get expensive pretty quickly, how about we just chuck them in the dumpster behind the 7-11? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 16 points 3 years ago (2 children) we can just batch them all, living and dead, into a single capsule so we only need a single launch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RustyVenture@hexbear.net 12 points 3 years ago And nothing of value would have been lost in the event of a catastrophic launch failure. permalink fedilink source parent [–] drhead@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) Unfortunately the delta-v requirements for a solar "landing" are already absurd (think having an entire Saturn V in orbit, and that still not being enough). How about conscripting them into being the brave astronauts on the Voyager 3 mission, where they will journey aimlessly outside of our solar system? A rocket capable of putting a man on Mars would be very easily capable of yeeting a man out of the solar system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago ngl, hadn't done the math but it surprises me that it's easier to get to the outer solar system than to perform a solar "landing". we don't need to include an oxygen tank, right? should save some weight so they craft can get further from any planets -- wouldn't want to pollute Mars or something by accident. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 24 points 3 years ago (1 child) how about shooting them into the sun? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Indifference_Engine@hexbear.net 21 points 3 years ago (1 child) That can get expensive pretty quickly, how about we just chuck them in the dumpster behind the 7-11? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 16 points 3 years ago (2 children) we can just batch them all, living and dead, into a single capsule so we only need a single launch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RustyVenture@hexbear.net 12 points 3 years ago And nothing of value would have been lost in the event of a catastrophic launch failure. permalink fedilink source parent [–] drhead@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) Unfortunately the delta-v requirements for a solar "landing" are already absurd (think having an entire Saturn V in orbit, and that still not being enough). How about conscripting them into being the brave astronauts on the Voyager 3 mission, where they will journey aimlessly outside of our solar system? A rocket capable of putting a man on Mars would be very easily capable of yeeting a man out of the solar system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago ngl, hadn't done the math but it surprises me that it's easier to get to the outer solar system than to perform a solar "landing". we don't need to include an oxygen tank, right? should save some weight so they craft can get further from any planets -- wouldn't want to pollute Mars or something by accident. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Indifference_Engine@hexbear.net 21 points 3 years ago (1 child) That can get expensive pretty quickly, how about we just chuck them in the dumpster behind the 7-11? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 16 points 3 years ago (2 children) we can just batch them all, living and dead, into a single capsule so we only need a single launch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RustyVenture@hexbear.net 12 points 3 years ago And nothing of value would have been lost in the event of a catastrophic launch failure. permalink fedilink source parent [–] drhead@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) Unfortunately the delta-v requirements for a solar "landing" are already absurd (think having an entire Saturn V in orbit, and that still not being enough). How about conscripting them into being the brave astronauts on the Voyager 3 mission, where they will journey aimlessly outside of our solar system? A rocket capable of putting a man on Mars would be very easily capable of yeeting a man out of the solar system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago ngl, hadn't done the math but it surprises me that it's easier to get to the outer solar system than to perform a solar "landing". we don't need to include an oxygen tank, right? should save some weight so they craft can get further from any planets -- wouldn't want to pollute Mars or something by accident. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 16 points 3 years ago (2 children) we can just batch them all, living and dead, into a single capsule so we only need a single launch. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RustyVenture@hexbear.net 12 points 3 years ago And nothing of value would have been lost in the event of a catastrophic launch failure. permalink fedilink source parent [–] drhead@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) Unfortunately the delta-v requirements for a solar "landing" are already absurd (think having an entire Saturn V in orbit, and that still not being enough). How about conscripting them into being the brave astronauts on the Voyager 3 mission, where they will journey aimlessly outside of our solar system? A rocket capable of putting a man on Mars would be very easily capable of yeeting a man out of the solar system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago ngl, hadn't done the math but it surprises me that it's easier to get to the outer solar system than to perform a solar "landing". we don't need to include an oxygen tank, right? should save some weight so they craft can get further from any planets -- wouldn't want to pollute Mars or something by accident. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RustyVenture@hexbear.net 12 points 3 years ago And nothing of value would have been lost in the event of a catastrophic launch failure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] drhead@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) Unfortunately the delta-v requirements for a solar "landing" are already absurd (think having an entire Saturn V in orbit, and that still not being enough). How about conscripting them into being the brave astronauts on the Voyager 3 mission, where they will journey aimlessly outside of our solar system? A rocket capable of putting a man on Mars would be very easily capable of yeeting a man out of the solar system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] silent_water@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago ngl, hadn't done the math but it surprises me that it's easier to get to the outer solar system than to perform a solar "landing". we don't need to include an oxygen tank, right? should save some weight so they craft can get further from any planets -- wouldn't want to pollute Mars or something by accident. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 6 points 3 years ago ngl, hadn't done the math but it surprises me that it's easier to get to the outer solar system than to perform a solar "landing". we don't need to include an oxygen tank, right? should save some weight so they craft can get further from any planets -- wouldn't want to pollute Mars or something by accident. permalink fedilink source parent