you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -7 points 8 months ago (6 children)

This is a lot of words to basically say the developers didn’t bother to block illegal content. It doesn’t need to ‘understand’ morality for the humans running it to be responsible for what it produces.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 8 months ago* (3 children)

    Neither of you are wrong. LLMs are wild uncaged animals. You're asking why we didn't make a cage, and they're saying we don't even know how to make one yet.

    So, why are we letting the dangerous feral beast roam around unchecked?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Because being irresponsible is financially rewarding. There’s no downside. Just golden parachutes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    We as a society have failed to implement those consequences. When the government refused, we should have taken up the mantle ourselves. It should be a mark of great virtue to have the head of a CEO mounted over your fireplace.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Yeah, how hard is it to block certain keywords from being added to the prompt?

    We've had lists like that since the 90's. Hardly new technology. Even prevents prompt hacking if you're clever about it.

  • source
  • parent