598
Grok AI still being used to digitally undress women and children despite suspension pledge (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 8 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
90 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 46 points 8 months ago (7 children)

If they are being stored on his servers then he absolutely should be, and whoever else is in charge of that company. If that was found on any regular persons pc it would be over, so why not here.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    In America:

    Section 230 of the Communications Act provides immunity for online platforms and users, stating they generally aren't liable for content posted by others, allowing them to host third-party information without being treated as the "publisher or speaker".

    I'm guessing Europe has a similar provision.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    The story says:

    After days of concern over use of the chatbot to alter photographs to create sexualised pictures of real women and children stripped to their underwear without their consent

    Pictures of women or children in underwear are generally not illegal in the United States.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •