764
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

Why put "kidnap" in quotes, it's not as if it's a wild claim?

It certainly wasn't lawful in Venezuela, where I believe the kidnapping occurred.

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

because it actually is a "wifenab" or wifenap but the word doesn't exist.

it was not a political choice but a linguistic (non)sensibility

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

What? Kidnapping doesn’t only happen to kids, adults can be kidnapped as well. Also if you are dead set on calling it something else it would just be abducted, like she’s a whole person not just a wife.

[-] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

yes, "abducted" is surely a better word choice but my comment was a reply to the title. so i used the same word and put it in quotation marks.

Now… why did they abduct a "whole other person" who is Nicolás Maduro's wife?

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Kidnapped had been the appropriate word choice since the mid-1800’s at least.

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

not sure why we are arguing about word choice? if you understand the intent, just move on.. why be critical?

this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
764 points (98.7% liked)

NonCredibleDiplomacy

627 readers
214 users here now

Shitposting about geopolitics, diplomacy, and current events for shits and giggles

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS