▲ 715 ▼ Bazzite has seen a massive jolt in growth over the holiday season, surpassing 50k active users. The Fedora Atomic image has gained 38.8k users total in 2025 since it began counting in April 🥳 (lemmy.ml) submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by marcie@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml 196 comments fedilink hide all child comments https://github.com/ublue-os/countme/blob/main/growth_global.svg Graphs can be found here on their github. Since around mid November the active user count for Bazzite has gone up by around 16k active users. Personally, my only wish for Bazzite is a Cosmic version 👼 I tried it out recently and it seems fairly impressive
[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children) They literally say they are a fucking container tool like Docker in their own FAQ , you silly person. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) Read again. You completely misunderstood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 1 point 7 months ago (1 child) What's a container that doesn't run natively on the system called? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago (1 child) There is no such thing. Containers are just separated from the rest of your system by cgroups. You can even see the executable running in containers with ps and top. They're native binaries running on the same kernel as the rest of your system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 1 point 7 months ago ☁️ permalink fedilink source parent [–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago That's not what they were refuting. They were just saying that containers run on the metal just like any other software. 🙂 permalink fedilink source parent [–] markstos@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago (1 child) That’s not what the FAQ says, rather it says Flatpaks are often sandboxed but not fully containerized. Containers don’t need to have a performance penalty because they run on the same kernel as the host. Container tech applies a chroot, disables some capabilities within the container and that’s about it. They are in contrast to virtual machines that need to boot an entire additional OS before doing anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 0 points 7 months ago Looks like I don't understand how it works and should simply shut the fuck up instead of spreading nonsense. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago (1 child) Read again. You completely misunderstood. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 1 point 7 months ago (1 child) What's a container that doesn't run natively on the system called? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago (1 child) There is no such thing. Containers are just separated from the rest of your system by cgroups. You can even see the executable running in containers with ps and top. They're native binaries running on the same kernel as the rest of your system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 1 point 7 months ago ☁️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 1 point 7 months ago (1 child) What's a container that doesn't run natively on the system called? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago (1 child) There is no such thing. Containers are just separated from the rest of your system by cgroups. You can even see the executable running in containers with ps and top. They're native binaries running on the same kernel as the rest of your system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 1 point 7 months ago ☁️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago (1 child) There is no such thing. Containers are just separated from the rest of your system by cgroups. You can even see the executable running in containers with ps and top. They're native binaries running on the same kernel as the rest of your system. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 1 point 7 months ago ☁️ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago That's not what they were refuting. They were just saying that containers run on the metal just like any other software. 🙂 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] markstos@lemmy.world 1 point 7 months ago (1 child) That’s not what the FAQ says, rather it says Flatpaks are often sandboxed but not fully containerized. Containers don’t need to have a performance penalty because they run on the same kernel as the host. Container tech applies a chroot, disables some capabilities within the container and that’s about it. They are in contrast to virtual machines that need to boot an entire additional OS before doing anything. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 0 points 7 months ago Looks like I don't understand how it works and should simply shut the fuck up instead of spreading nonsense. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BaroqueInMind@piefed.social 0 points 7 months ago Looks like I don't understand how it works and should simply shut the fuck up instead of spreading nonsense. permalink fedilink source parent
