▲ 905 ▼ Apple to Limit iPhone 15 USB-C Cables to USB 2.0 Speeds: Report (www.extremetech.com) submitted 3 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 333 comments fedilink hide all child comments Apple to Limit iPhone 15 USB-C Cables to USB 2.0 Speeds: Report::undefined
[+] lud@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Yoddel_Hickory@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 years ago (3 children) ... iPhone has USB 2.0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] lud@lemm.ee -2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] delta@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don’t think they intended to imply that faster USB support _isn’t needed _, but rather they are making a mockery of how absolutely absurd this reality is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] MinekPo1@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) And if USB SS+ (aka USB 3.1 gen 2 aka USB 3.2 gen 2×1) with 10 Gb/s is not enough for you, the newest iteration of the USB standard USB 4.0 version 2.0 has USB4 gen 4 at 80 Gb/s Edit: for reference: Wi-Fi 4 supports up to 600 Mb/s or .6 Gb/s, while Wi-Fi 7 supports up to 46.12 Gb/s permalink fedilink source parent [–] cor315@lemmy.world 1 point 3 years ago That's his point. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Yoddel_Hickory@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 years ago (3 children) ... iPhone has USB 2.0 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] lud@lemm.ee -2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] delta@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don’t think they intended to imply that faster USB support _isn’t needed _, but rather they are making a mockery of how absolutely absurd this reality is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lud@lemm.ee -2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] delta@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don’t think they intended to imply that faster USB support _isn’t needed _, but rather they are making a mockery of how absolutely absurd this reality is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] delta@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) I don’t think they intended to imply that faster USB support _isn’t needed _, but rather they are making a mockery of how absolutely absurd this reality is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MinekPo1@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) And if USB SS+ (aka USB 3.1 gen 2 aka USB 3.2 gen 2×1) with 10 Gb/s is not enough for you, the newest iteration of the USB standard USB 4.0 version 2.0 has USB4 gen 4 at 80 Gb/s Edit: for reference: Wi-Fi 4 supports up to 600 Mb/s or .6 Gb/s, while Wi-Fi 7 supports up to 46.12 Gb/s permalink fedilink source parent