eru comments on I think there's an imposter amongus

I think there's an imposter amongus (mander.xyz)

submitted 8 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] eru@mouse.chitanda.moe 32 points 8 months ago (2 children)

if you state something based on previous work in the field even if its your own you should still cite it...

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] DoPeopleLookHere@sh.itjust.works 23 points 8 months ago

The implication that the reviewer thinks they're stupid and need to read more papers and try again.

Not that they're mis-citing works.

parent

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

No should, but must.

In Academia, stupid as it is, if you use or cite previous work of yours without citing it, it's plagiarism.

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] ProfessorPeregrine@reddthat.com 12 points 8 months ago

It's not stupid. Anyone reading needs to know where a statement or conclusion comes from in case they need to check and see how that conclusion was reached in the first place.

parent