Sydney Sweeney is an objectively very bad actor, has a long history of acting out for attention irl, and genuinely only gets roles because of her appearance(and to be fair because she's a good businesswoman, but the casting certainly isn't because of her acting abilities).

Ya huh. That means you agree it's not just her boobs doing the work, she is also doing the work. Therefore reducing her to just her boobs is misogynistic. You're stuck on she's a bad actor when that isn't the argument, you honestly seem to be going on your own personal tirade.

Sure, tell me where I'm acting illogically and I'll go ahead and shatter that illusion for you as well.

You absolutely are, you admit she works for it. Maybe not in ways you agree with but in ways that are definitively not about her tits.

You agree, you're just stuck in a sunk cost fallacy or you simply didn't understand the argument before interjecting yourself.