18+

You must be 18+ to view this community

You must be at least eighteen years old to view this. Are you over eighteen and willing to see adult content?

 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 9 months ago (1 child)

you actually already agreed with me but seemingly didn't notice.

At no point did I not acknowledge that she's worked hard to get where she is or that she has the connections and industry reach to secure work. That doesn't magically make her not have the acting ability of a paralyzed fish. You can work really hard at something all your life and still be fucking terrible at it.

so that logically cannot be the answer.

Hun, you and the word logic should never be paired in the same sentence. This sweeping handwaving rant where you pull weaker conclusions from nothing than I've seen middle schoolers create really demonstrates that.

You on the other hand are writing paragraphs defending misogyny, that says something about you.

I'm not defending misogyny because what you're doing isn't calling it out, but is actually reinforcing it. I'm specifically calling out your behavior. I'm done talking to a brick wall though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 9 months ago

    Sydney Sweeney is an objectively very bad actor, has a long history of acting out for attention irl, and genuinely only gets roles because of her appearance(and to be fair because she's a good businesswoman, but the casting certainly isn't because of her acting abilities).

    Ya huh. That means you agree it's not just her boobs doing the work, she is also doing the work. Therefore reducing her to just her boobs is misogynistic. You're stuck on she's a bad actor when that isn't the argument, you honestly seem to be going on your own personal tirade.

    Sure, tell me where I'm acting illogically and I'll go ahead and shatter that illusion for you as well.

    You absolutely are, you admit she works for it. Maybe not in ways you agree with but in ways that are definitively not about her tits.

    You agree, you're just stuck in a sunk cost fallacy or you simply didn't understand the argument before interjecting yourself.

  • source
  • parent