I do not really have a body for this. I was not aware that this is a thing and still feel like this is bs, but maybe there is an actual explanation for HDMI Forum's decision that I am missing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 37 points 10 months ago (15 children)

Time to kill HDMI with USB 4/TB bring those cost way down.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Display Port would be better suited to do all of those things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Usb-c supports DisplayPort! Long live open standards!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Except DisplayPort has high data transfer speed requirements and many cables that fit the nice reversible ports do not support it.

    Source: me testing every cable at home to find one that supports DP + PD

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    Normalize USB-c with screws and we have a deal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    With cinema camera accessories, we have these “locking” USB C plugs. They have these notches that help stay in the port. I say it’s about 2.5x more firm and doesn’t wiggle much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Like the old USB micros sort of?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments