▲ 775 ▼ HDMI Forum is unwilling to disclose the 2.1 specification for open-source (Linux): according to AMD, they had submitted a functional, HDMI 2.1-compatible driver [for linux?], which the Forum rejected. (www.heise.de) submitted 10 months ago by VoxAliorum@lemmy.ml to c/opensource@lemmy.ml 178 comments fedilink hide all child comments I do not really have a body for this. I was not aware that this is a thing and still feel like this is bs, but maybe there is an actual explanation for HDMI Forum's decision that I am missing.
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 10 months ago (9 children) I'm a very technical person and I can't tell them apart. Is there a symbol? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 43 points 10 months ago (7 children) It’s pretty simple and straightforward, all you have to so is buy the cable and a professional cable tester to see what specs it’s actually in compliance with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 10 months ago (1 child) Don’t worry, I’m sure when USB 4 releases, they’ll retroactively change the names of USB 3.2 Gen 1 and USB 3.2 Gen 2 to “USB 4.3 Gen 0.01” and “USB 4.3 Gen 0.02” respectively. Then USB 4 will actually be named “USB 4.4 Gen 5” just because. And none of the cables will be labeled, nor will they simultaneously support high power delivery and full data speed. We’ll need to wait for “USB 4.4 Gen 4” for that, which is when the old standard will get renamed to “USB 4.4 Gen 3.5” instead. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 10 months ago "USB4" (not USB 4.0) released in 2019 and "USB4 Version 2.0" (not USB 4.1) released in 2022. permalink fedilink source parent [–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (4 children) These days a ~10€ gadget can tell you about the electricity going through a USB connection and what the cable is capable of. I don't like the idea of basically requiring this to get that knowledge, but considering the limited space on the USB-C plugs I'm not sure anything is likely to improve about their labeling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 14 points 10 months ago (3 children) That's good enough for me, what they called and wee where can I get one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children) An example I randomly picked: https://www.amazon.de/Messger%C3%A4t-Strommessger%C3%A4t-Multimeter-Strommesser-Leistungskapazit%C3%A4t/dp/B0DK5GGVLM permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (1 child) I have something like this myself, it's useful for knowing the power delivery of the cable/port combination, but I'm not sure if that really helps when it comes to determining the speed of the data transmission that the cable/port is capable of, or other features like displayport support, or which version of USB4 it might be supporting (I believe they have the same power delivery, even though the transfer speed is double). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago Yeah, functionality between these varies, I know some of them can tell you what capabilities the cable's chip spits out. permalink fedilink source parent [–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago Nope! That's part of the fun sadly. At least if you're technical you'll know that not all type-c cables are the same. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 43 points 10 months ago (7 children) It’s pretty simple and straightforward, all you have to so is buy the cable and a professional cable tester to see what specs it’s actually in compliance with permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 10 months ago (1 child) Don’t worry, I’m sure when USB 4 releases, they’ll retroactively change the names of USB 3.2 Gen 1 and USB 3.2 Gen 2 to “USB 4.3 Gen 0.01” and “USB 4.3 Gen 0.02” respectively. Then USB 4 will actually be named “USB 4.4 Gen 5” just because. And none of the cables will be labeled, nor will they simultaneously support high power delivery and full data speed. We’ll need to wait for “USB 4.4 Gen 4” for that, which is when the old standard will get renamed to “USB 4.4 Gen 3.5” instead. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 10 months ago "USB4" (not USB 4.0) released in 2019 and "USB4 Version 2.0" (not USB 4.1) released in 2022. permalink fedilink source parent [–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (4 children) These days a ~10€ gadget can tell you about the electricity going through a USB connection and what the cable is capable of. I don't like the idea of basically requiring this to get that knowledge, but considering the limited space on the USB-C plugs I'm not sure anything is likely to improve about their labeling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 14 points 10 months ago (3 children) That's good enough for me, what they called and wee where can I get one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children) An example I randomly picked: https://www.amazon.de/Messger%C3%A4t-Strommessger%C3%A4t-Multimeter-Strommesser-Leistungskapazit%C3%A4t/dp/B0DK5GGVLM permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (1 child) I have something like this myself, it's useful for knowing the power delivery of the cable/port combination, but I'm not sure if that really helps when it comes to determining the speed of the data transmission that the cable/port is capable of, or other features like displayport support, or which version of USB4 it might be supporting (I believe they have the same power delivery, even though the transfer speed is double). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago Yeah, functionality between these varies, I know some of them can tell you what capabilities the cable's chip spits out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 10 months ago (1 child) Don’t worry, I’m sure when USB 4 releases, they’ll retroactively change the names of USB 3.2 Gen 1 and USB 3.2 Gen 2 to “USB 4.3 Gen 0.01” and “USB 4.3 Gen 0.02” respectively. Then USB 4 will actually be named “USB 4.4 Gen 5” just because. And none of the cables will be labeled, nor will they simultaneously support high power delivery and full data speed. We’ll need to wait for “USB 4.4 Gen 4” for that, which is when the old standard will get renamed to “USB 4.4 Gen 3.5” instead. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 10 months ago "USB4" (not USB 4.0) released in 2019 and "USB4 Version 2.0" (not USB 4.1) released in 2022. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 10 months ago "USB4" (not USB 4.0) released in 2019 and "USB4 Version 2.0" (not USB 4.1) released in 2022. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (4 children) These days a ~10€ gadget can tell you about the electricity going through a USB connection and what the cable is capable of. I don't like the idea of basically requiring this to get that knowledge, but considering the limited space on the USB-C plugs I'm not sure anything is likely to improve about their labeling. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 14 points 10 months ago (3 children) That's good enough for me, what they called and wee where can I get one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children) An example I randomly picked: https://www.amazon.de/Messger%C3%A4t-Strommessger%C3%A4t-Multimeter-Strommesser-Leistungskapazit%C3%A4t/dp/B0DK5GGVLM permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (1 child) I have something like this myself, it's useful for knowing the power delivery of the cable/port combination, but I'm not sure if that really helps when it comes to determining the speed of the data transmission that the cable/port is capable of, or other features like displayport support, or which version of USB4 it might be supporting (I believe they have the same power delivery, even though the transfer speed is double). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago Yeah, functionality between these varies, I know some of them can tell you what capabilities the cable's chip spits out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 14 points 10 months ago (3 children) That's good enough for me, what they called and wee where can I get one? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children) An example I randomly picked: https://www.amazon.de/Messger%C3%A4t-Strommessger%C3%A4t-Multimeter-Strommesser-Leistungskapazit%C3%A4t/dp/B0DK5GGVLM permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (1 child) I have something like this myself, it's useful for knowing the power delivery of the cable/port combination, but I'm not sure if that really helps when it comes to determining the speed of the data transmission that the cable/port is capable of, or other features like displayport support, or which version of USB4 it might be supporting (I believe they have the same power delivery, even though the transfer speed is double). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago Yeah, functionality between these varies, I know some of them can tell you what capabilities the cable's chip spits out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children) An example I randomly picked: https://www.amazon.de/Messger%C3%A4t-Strommessger%C3%A4t-Multimeter-Strommesser-Leistungskapazit%C3%A4t/dp/B0DK5GGVLM permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (1 child) I have something like this myself, it's useful for knowing the power delivery of the cable/port combination, but I'm not sure if that really helps when it comes to determining the speed of the data transmission that the cable/port is capable of, or other features like displayport support, or which version of USB4 it might be supporting (I believe they have the same power delivery, even though the transfer speed is double). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago Yeah, functionality between these varies, I know some of them can tell you what capabilities the cable's chip spits out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago* (1 child) I have something like this myself, it's useful for knowing the power delivery of the cable/port combination, but I'm not sure if that really helps when it comes to determining the speed of the data transmission that the cable/port is capable of, or other features like displayport support, or which version of USB4 it might be supporting (I believe they have the same power delivery, even though the transfer speed is double). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago Yeah, functionality between these varies, I know some of them can tell you what capabilities the cable's chip spits out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 1 point 10 months ago Yeah, functionality between these varies, I know some of them can tell you what capabilities the cable's chip spits out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago Nope! That's part of the fun sadly. At least if you're technical you'll know that not all type-c cables are the same. permalink fedilink source parent