233
TIL how tall buildings are (thelemmy.club)
submitted 10 months ago by to c/til@lemmy.ca
65 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 46 points 10 months ago (14 children)

That's a misleading graph as it starts at 4000m

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    What's misleading about it?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (9 children)

    Everest isn’t 8000 meters from the base to peak. It’s 8000 meters at the peak but the foothills are several hundred meters high before you even get to everest. The buildings shown would have to be shown below ground if we really wanted to see them compared to everest’s height.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 24 points 10 months ago (4 children)
    1. The buildings are shown as you would see them if they were built at the base of the mountain, to show its size. The sea level is irrelevant for this illustration.
    2. This isn't Mount Everest.
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (3 children)

    Then why is the top listed as everest’s height k2’s height (just woke up and can’t read yet), ? It should list height from base to peak, not sea level to peak. It’s misleading this way.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    It shows the height above sea level at the base, too.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Buildings and mountain are shown at actual size. The graphic is only comparing prominence.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    The misleading part is having the picture labeled as the height of k2 here. The height listed should be its prominence not sea level to peak.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    People generally refer to mountains by their altitude, and buildings by prominence. Those that are aware of the difference can subtract 4000 from 8611. Those that are not would be confused by different labeling.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    That’s not the issue i had with the photo. It was it not being labeled at the proper height from the base. I didn’t notice the label at the bottom hence the strike-thru of my comment.

    Those that don’t completely read the comment thread can be confused by different markup labeling.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent