▲ 45 ▼ Who wants war with Russia? (lemmy.ml) submitted 9 months ago by Confidant6198@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml 86 comments fedilink hide all child comments cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/9844277
[+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (38 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source hideshow 38 child comments replies: [–] bobr@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org 0 points 9 months ago (37 children) Do you mean that the Ukrainian people are getting assaulted, kidnapped On the territories still controlled by Zelensky's regime - yes, kidnapping and assault (busification) is daily occurence indeed. murdered Well, this is the point of busification, to send the people to die, so also yes. Thankfully, Russia is slowly but steadily liberating people from that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (17 children) You're right. War is hell. We should be pressuring the aggressor to end this before more people die. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (16 children) They're doing their best, but someone keeps refusing a peace treaty🤔 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 9 months ago (15 children) One would argue that the aggressor should be making concessions not the victim, but it seems like you've already picked a side. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (14 children) You could argue that, if you were both woefully uninformed about who the aggressor is and laughably ignorant about how armed conflict works. You could. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children) I'm just the most decorated veteran in my family with 5 generations of service, but sure teach me how armed conflict works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Ukraine provoked said war for 8 years. Fully believing (or being led to believe) it would win. it did ethnic cleansing in Donbas during that time and was preparing to finish the job when Russia brought the Hammer down In a war the losing side has to make concessions to reach peace, not the winning side. Russia is winning that war, ergo Ukraine has to make concessions. In WW2 Japan surrendered unconditionally, it was not the Allies who made any concessions to Japan. When Prussia invaded Denmark, Denmark conceded Holstein to Prussia. Prussia did not concede anything to Denmark, it won that war. Did you per chance believe that Mexico turned over half of its territory to the USA because it was in a good mode or something? The US defeated Mexico in a war, Mexico had to make huge territorial concessions. It is completely irrelevant who was the agressor in this regard. In other words: Why should I concede you something when I am in a position to take more? You have to concede something to prevent me from taking more. 5 generations of not knowing how peace making works. Something any grand strategy video game would've teached you. Or looking up any war in history. Loser makes concessions, how hard is this to get? permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) No problem! So when you win, you get to set the terms of the treaty. When you lose, you don't. Surprised they didn't go over this in war school, but whatev I'm happy to help permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) I fail to see what this has to do with Ukraine. You're going to have to pull out your 2 dollar words. The war isn't over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. Until then there is no winner or loser. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children) No worries: -Russia Win -Ukraine Lose -Winner get write rules The war isn’t over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. -Sentences spoken from a bunker in Berlin. You're a decorated imperial veteran and you don't understand the concept of "combat ineffective?" What were they even teaching you in war crimes school? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) So you're rooting for Russia. Got it. Have a good life. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Lol @ the spiteful sports team mentality. Yeah man i got two big RUSSIA foam fingers. Everyone is twelve now. permalink fedilink source parent [+] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago Sigh Allow me, @RiverRock@lemmy.ml. The US-backed Maidan coup and US & Ukraine-supported fascist paramilitary attacks on eastern & southern Ukraine: Reuters, 2014: Leaked audio reveals embarrassing U.S. exchange on Ukraine, EU Leaked recording between Nuland and Pyatt: audio | transcript Counterpunch, 2014: US Imperialism and the Ukraine Coup BBC, 2014: Ukraine underplays role of far right in conflict Human Rights Watch, 2014: Ukraine: Unguided Rockets Killing Civilians Consortium News, 2015: The Mess That Nuland Made Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland engineered Ukraine’s regime change without weighing the likely consequences. The Hill, 2017: The reality of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is far from Kremlin propaganda The Guardian, 2017: 'I want to bring up a warrior': Ukraine's far-right children's camp – video WaPo, 2018: The war in Ukraine is more devastating than you know Reuters, 2018: Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem The Nation, 2019: Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine openDemocracy, 2019: Why Ukraine’s new language law will have long-term consequences Al Jazeera, 2022: Why did Ukraine suspend 11 ‘pro-Russia’ parties? Jacobin, 2022: A US-Backed, Far Right–Led Revolution in Ukraine Helped Bring Us to the Brink of War Consortium News, 2023: The West’s Sabotage of Peace in Ukraine Former Israeli Prime Minister Bennett’s recent comments about getting his mediation efforts squashed in the early days of the war adds more to the growing pile of evidence that Western powers are intent on regime change in Russia. Internationalist 360°, 2022–2024: History of Fascism in Ukraine: Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV NYT, 2024: U.N. Court to Rule on Whether Ukraine Committed Genocide NATO expansion: George Washington Univ., 2017: NATO Expansion: What Gorbachev Heard Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner Orinoco Tribune, 2022: Former German Chancellor Merkel Admits that Minsk Peace Agreements Were Part of Scheme for Ukraine to Buy Time to Prepare for War With Russia Al Mayadeen, 2023: Zelensky admits he never intended to implement Minsk agreements Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: The War in Ukraine Was Provoked—and Why That Matters to Achieve Peace Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: NATO Chief Admits NATO Expansion Was Key to Russian Invasion of Ukraine NATO in general: The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance Noam Chomsky, 2023: NATO “most violent, aggressive alliance in the world” Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It permalink fedilink source parent [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) He'll yeah borther semper pie permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (1 child) It's an old leftbook meme making fun of guys like you but don't let that get in the way of your corny qanon-ass conspiracies about Russian spies👍 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -2 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [+] Sideshow_B00b@lemmy.zip -7 points 9 months ago (15 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 22 points 9 months ago (14 children) Shitlibs complain about .ml censoring them and then when you actually look it's them getting a comment removed (not even a ban) for calling people evil Russians and telling them to kill themselves permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] sephallen@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago (13 children) I literally had a comment removed and was soft banned from World News for suggesting you had an alt account with no explanation why. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 14 points 9 months ago (5 children) You said it yourself: for suggesting that he had an alt account. That could get you a ban on dbzer0 as well, in that case for “bad-jacketing”: https://wiki.dbzer0.com/divisions-by-zero/the-golden-rules/ Don’t be shitty. i.e. telling people to kill themselves, or bad-jacketing is bannable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Thank you for the explanation, it might be worth adding bad-jacketing to the rules or code of conduct. Is dbzer0 somehow related to lemmy.ml? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) No, dbzer0 is its own thing. What they have in common is they’re both run by socialists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago (2 children) Does being accused of being a bot qualify as bad-jacketing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (1 child) The dbzer0 admins seem to think so, from what I’ve seen, but you’d have to ask them. The point is, unless you have the receipts to prove it, don’t call someone a bot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago I can get behind that, thanks again for clarifying things. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (6 children) You got a one day ban for direct personal attacks. Once again: people complaining about .ml "censoring" them are always just people mad that the rules got enforced on them when they're used to the mods giving them a parse for having the same politics permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -4 points 9 months ago (5 children) You're wrong, it was for bad-jacketing which currently is not actually in the rules for lemmy.ml or that News community. I did not make any personal attacks, but I have seen a lot on here which do not get removed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) Ah huh. You can play dumb if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -5 points 9 months ago (3 children) I am pretty curious as to how you'd know more details about my comment removal and ban than I do. It would be pretty unethical if you had access to a mod account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (2 children) Because I can read the modlog, genius. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago (1 child) Thank you for the kind words and the tip! It seems like the comment was removed because it broke Rule 2: "Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here." I'm also still banned from that community - presumably it was a 3 day ban and not 24 hours. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago You're correct: it was not a 24 hour ban: I misread it because it happened to have 24 hours left when I checked it. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Sideshow_B00b@lemmy.zip -8 points 9 months ago (1 child) Oh you guys with your pro-Ruzzia hard-ons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] bobr@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org 10 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -8 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bobr@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org 0 points 9 months ago (37 children) Do you mean that the Ukrainian people are getting assaulted, kidnapped On the territories still controlled by Zelensky's regime - yes, kidnapping and assault (busification) is daily occurence indeed. murdered Well, this is the point of busification, to send the people to die, so also yes. Thankfully, Russia is slowly but steadily liberating people from that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 37 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (17 children) You're right. War is hell. We should be pressuring the aggressor to end this before more people die. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (16 children) They're doing their best, but someone keeps refusing a peace treaty🤔 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 9 months ago (15 children) One would argue that the aggressor should be making concessions not the victim, but it seems like you've already picked a side. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (14 children) You could argue that, if you were both woefully uninformed about who the aggressor is and laughably ignorant about how armed conflict works. You could. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children) I'm just the most decorated veteran in my family with 5 generations of service, but sure teach me how armed conflict works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Ukraine provoked said war for 8 years. Fully believing (or being led to believe) it would win. it did ethnic cleansing in Donbas during that time and was preparing to finish the job when Russia brought the Hammer down In a war the losing side has to make concessions to reach peace, not the winning side. Russia is winning that war, ergo Ukraine has to make concessions. In WW2 Japan surrendered unconditionally, it was not the Allies who made any concessions to Japan. When Prussia invaded Denmark, Denmark conceded Holstein to Prussia. Prussia did not concede anything to Denmark, it won that war. Did you per chance believe that Mexico turned over half of its territory to the USA because it was in a good mode or something? The US defeated Mexico in a war, Mexico had to make huge territorial concessions. It is completely irrelevant who was the agressor in this regard. In other words: Why should I concede you something when I am in a position to take more? You have to concede something to prevent me from taking more. 5 generations of not knowing how peace making works. Something any grand strategy video game would've teached you. Or looking up any war in history. Loser makes concessions, how hard is this to get? permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) No problem! So when you win, you get to set the terms of the treaty. When you lose, you don't. Surprised they didn't go over this in war school, but whatev I'm happy to help permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) I fail to see what this has to do with Ukraine. You're going to have to pull out your 2 dollar words. The war isn't over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. Until then there is no winner or loser. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children) No worries: -Russia Win -Ukraine Lose -Winner get write rules The war isn’t over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. -Sentences spoken from a bunker in Berlin. You're a decorated imperial veteran and you don't understand the concept of "combat ineffective?" What were they even teaching you in war crimes school? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) So you're rooting for Russia. Got it. Have a good life. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Lol @ the spiteful sports team mentality. Yeah man i got two big RUSSIA foam fingers. Everyone is twelve now. permalink fedilink source parent [+] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago Sigh Allow me, @RiverRock@lemmy.ml. The US-backed Maidan coup and US & Ukraine-supported fascist paramilitary attacks on eastern & southern Ukraine: Reuters, 2014: Leaked audio reveals embarrassing U.S. exchange on Ukraine, EU Leaked recording between Nuland and Pyatt: audio | transcript Counterpunch, 2014: US Imperialism and the Ukraine Coup BBC, 2014: Ukraine underplays role of far right in conflict Human Rights Watch, 2014: Ukraine: Unguided Rockets Killing Civilians Consortium News, 2015: The Mess That Nuland Made Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland engineered Ukraine’s regime change without weighing the likely consequences. The Hill, 2017: The reality of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is far from Kremlin propaganda The Guardian, 2017: 'I want to bring up a warrior': Ukraine's far-right children's camp – video WaPo, 2018: The war in Ukraine is more devastating than you know Reuters, 2018: Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem The Nation, 2019: Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine openDemocracy, 2019: Why Ukraine’s new language law will have long-term consequences Al Jazeera, 2022: Why did Ukraine suspend 11 ‘pro-Russia’ parties? Jacobin, 2022: A US-Backed, Far Right–Led Revolution in Ukraine Helped Bring Us to the Brink of War Consortium News, 2023: The West’s Sabotage of Peace in Ukraine Former Israeli Prime Minister Bennett’s recent comments about getting his mediation efforts squashed in the early days of the war adds more to the growing pile of evidence that Western powers are intent on regime change in Russia. Internationalist 360°, 2022–2024: History of Fascism in Ukraine: Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV NYT, 2024: U.N. Court to Rule on Whether Ukraine Committed Genocide NATO expansion: George Washington Univ., 2017: NATO Expansion: What Gorbachev Heard Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner Orinoco Tribune, 2022: Former German Chancellor Merkel Admits that Minsk Peace Agreements Were Part of Scheme for Ukraine to Buy Time to Prepare for War With Russia Al Mayadeen, 2023: Zelensky admits he never intended to implement Minsk agreements Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: The War in Ukraine Was Provoked—and Why That Matters to Achieve Peace Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: NATO Chief Admits NATO Expansion Was Key to Russian Invasion of Ukraine NATO in general: The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance Noam Chomsky, 2023: NATO “most violent, aggressive alliance in the world” Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It permalink fedilink source parent [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) He'll yeah borther semper pie permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (1 child) It's an old leftbook meme making fun of guys like you but don't let that get in the way of your corny qanon-ass conspiracies about Russian spies👍 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -2 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [+] Sideshow_B00b@lemmy.zip -7 points 9 months ago (15 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 22 points 9 months ago (14 children) Shitlibs complain about .ml censoring them and then when you actually look it's them getting a comment removed (not even a ban) for calling people evil Russians and telling them to kill themselves permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] sephallen@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago (13 children) I literally had a comment removed and was soft banned from World News for suggesting you had an alt account with no explanation why. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 14 points 9 months ago (5 children) You said it yourself: for suggesting that he had an alt account. That could get you a ban on dbzer0 as well, in that case for “bad-jacketing”: https://wiki.dbzer0.com/divisions-by-zero/the-golden-rules/ Don’t be shitty. i.e. telling people to kill themselves, or bad-jacketing is bannable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Thank you for the explanation, it might be worth adding bad-jacketing to the rules or code of conduct. Is dbzer0 somehow related to lemmy.ml? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) No, dbzer0 is its own thing. What they have in common is they’re both run by socialists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago (2 children) Does being accused of being a bot qualify as bad-jacketing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (1 child) The dbzer0 admins seem to think so, from what I’ve seen, but you’d have to ask them. The point is, unless you have the receipts to prove it, don’t call someone a bot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago I can get behind that, thanks again for clarifying things. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (6 children) You got a one day ban for direct personal attacks. Once again: people complaining about .ml "censoring" them are always just people mad that the rules got enforced on them when they're used to the mods giving them a parse for having the same politics permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -4 points 9 months ago (5 children) You're wrong, it was for bad-jacketing which currently is not actually in the rules for lemmy.ml or that News community. I did not make any personal attacks, but I have seen a lot on here which do not get removed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) Ah huh. You can play dumb if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -5 points 9 months ago (3 children) I am pretty curious as to how you'd know more details about my comment removal and ban than I do. It would be pretty unethical if you had access to a mod account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (2 children) Because I can read the modlog, genius. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago (1 child) Thank you for the kind words and the tip! It seems like the comment was removed because it broke Rule 2: "Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here." I'm also still banned from that community - presumably it was a 3 day ban and not 24 hours. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago You're correct: it was not a 24 hour ban: I misread it because it happened to have 24 hours left when I checked it. permalink fedilink source parent [+] Sideshow_B00b@lemmy.zip -8 points 9 months ago (1 child) Oh you guys with your pro-Ruzzia hard-ons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] bobr@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org 10 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -8 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (17 children) You're right. War is hell. We should be pressuring the aggressor to end this before more people die. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 17 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (16 children) They're doing their best, but someone keeps refusing a peace treaty🤔 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 9 months ago (15 children) One would argue that the aggressor should be making concessions not the victim, but it seems like you've already picked a side. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (14 children) You could argue that, if you were both woefully uninformed about who the aggressor is and laughably ignorant about how armed conflict works. You could. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children) I'm just the most decorated veteran in my family with 5 generations of service, but sure teach me how armed conflict works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Ukraine provoked said war for 8 years. Fully believing (or being led to believe) it would win. it did ethnic cleansing in Donbas during that time and was preparing to finish the job when Russia brought the Hammer down In a war the losing side has to make concessions to reach peace, not the winning side. Russia is winning that war, ergo Ukraine has to make concessions. In WW2 Japan surrendered unconditionally, it was not the Allies who made any concessions to Japan. When Prussia invaded Denmark, Denmark conceded Holstein to Prussia. Prussia did not concede anything to Denmark, it won that war. Did you per chance believe that Mexico turned over half of its territory to the USA because it was in a good mode or something? The US defeated Mexico in a war, Mexico had to make huge territorial concessions. It is completely irrelevant who was the agressor in this regard. In other words: Why should I concede you something when I am in a position to take more? You have to concede something to prevent me from taking more. 5 generations of not knowing how peace making works. Something any grand strategy video game would've teached you. Or looking up any war in history. Loser makes concessions, how hard is this to get? permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) No problem! So when you win, you get to set the terms of the treaty. When you lose, you don't. Surprised they didn't go over this in war school, but whatev I'm happy to help permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) I fail to see what this has to do with Ukraine. You're going to have to pull out your 2 dollar words. The war isn't over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. Until then there is no winner or loser. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children) No worries: -Russia Win -Ukraine Lose -Winner get write rules The war isn’t over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. -Sentences spoken from a bunker in Berlin. You're a decorated imperial veteran and you don't understand the concept of "combat ineffective?" What were they even teaching you in war crimes school? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) So you're rooting for Russia. Got it. Have a good life. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Lol @ the spiteful sports team mentality. Yeah man i got two big RUSSIA foam fingers. Everyone is twelve now. permalink fedilink source parent [+] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago Sigh Allow me, @RiverRock@lemmy.ml. The US-backed Maidan coup and US & Ukraine-supported fascist paramilitary attacks on eastern & southern Ukraine: Reuters, 2014: Leaked audio reveals embarrassing U.S. exchange on Ukraine, EU Leaked recording between Nuland and Pyatt: audio | transcript Counterpunch, 2014: US Imperialism and the Ukraine Coup BBC, 2014: Ukraine underplays role of far right in conflict Human Rights Watch, 2014: Ukraine: Unguided Rockets Killing Civilians Consortium News, 2015: The Mess That Nuland Made Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland engineered Ukraine’s regime change without weighing the likely consequences. The Hill, 2017: The reality of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is far from Kremlin propaganda The Guardian, 2017: 'I want to bring up a warrior': Ukraine's far-right children's camp – video WaPo, 2018: The war in Ukraine is more devastating than you know Reuters, 2018: Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem The Nation, 2019: Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine openDemocracy, 2019: Why Ukraine’s new language law will have long-term consequences Al Jazeera, 2022: Why did Ukraine suspend 11 ‘pro-Russia’ parties? Jacobin, 2022: A US-Backed, Far Right–Led Revolution in Ukraine Helped Bring Us to the Brink of War Consortium News, 2023: The West’s Sabotage of Peace in Ukraine Former Israeli Prime Minister Bennett’s recent comments about getting his mediation efforts squashed in the early days of the war adds more to the growing pile of evidence that Western powers are intent on regime change in Russia. Internationalist 360°, 2022–2024: History of Fascism in Ukraine: Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV NYT, 2024: U.N. Court to Rule on Whether Ukraine Committed Genocide NATO expansion: George Washington Univ., 2017: NATO Expansion: What Gorbachev Heard Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner Orinoco Tribune, 2022: Former German Chancellor Merkel Admits that Minsk Peace Agreements Were Part of Scheme for Ukraine to Buy Time to Prepare for War With Russia Al Mayadeen, 2023: Zelensky admits he never intended to implement Minsk agreements Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: The War in Ukraine Was Provoked—and Why That Matters to Achieve Peace Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: NATO Chief Admits NATO Expansion Was Key to Russian Invasion of Ukraine NATO in general: The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance Noam Chomsky, 2023: NATO “most violent, aggressive alliance in the world” Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It permalink fedilink source parent [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) He'll yeah borther semper pie permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (1 child) It's an old leftbook meme making fun of guys like you but don't let that get in the way of your corny qanon-ass conspiracies about Russian spies👍 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -2 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (16 children) They're doing their best, but someone keeps refusing a peace treaty🤔 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 9 months ago (15 children) One would argue that the aggressor should be making concessions not the victim, but it seems like you've already picked a side. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (14 children) You could argue that, if you were both woefully uninformed about who the aggressor is and laughably ignorant about how armed conflict works. You could. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children) I'm just the most decorated veteran in my family with 5 generations of service, but sure teach me how armed conflict works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Ukraine provoked said war for 8 years. Fully believing (or being led to believe) it would win. it did ethnic cleansing in Donbas during that time and was preparing to finish the job when Russia brought the Hammer down In a war the losing side has to make concessions to reach peace, not the winning side. Russia is winning that war, ergo Ukraine has to make concessions. In WW2 Japan surrendered unconditionally, it was not the Allies who made any concessions to Japan. When Prussia invaded Denmark, Denmark conceded Holstein to Prussia. Prussia did not concede anything to Denmark, it won that war. Did you per chance believe that Mexico turned over half of its territory to the USA because it was in a good mode or something? The US defeated Mexico in a war, Mexico had to make huge territorial concessions. It is completely irrelevant who was the agressor in this regard. In other words: Why should I concede you something when I am in a position to take more? You have to concede something to prevent me from taking more. 5 generations of not knowing how peace making works. Something any grand strategy video game would've teached you. Or looking up any war in history. Loser makes concessions, how hard is this to get? permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) No problem! So when you win, you get to set the terms of the treaty. When you lose, you don't. Surprised they didn't go over this in war school, but whatev I'm happy to help permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) I fail to see what this has to do with Ukraine. You're going to have to pull out your 2 dollar words. The war isn't over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. Until then there is no winner or loser. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children) No worries: -Russia Win -Ukraine Lose -Winner get write rules The war isn’t over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. -Sentences spoken from a bunker in Berlin. You're a decorated imperial veteran and you don't understand the concept of "combat ineffective?" What were they even teaching you in war crimes school? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) So you're rooting for Russia. Got it. Have a good life. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Lol @ the spiteful sports team mentality. Yeah man i got two big RUSSIA foam fingers. Everyone is twelve now. permalink fedilink source parent [+] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago Sigh Allow me, @RiverRock@lemmy.ml. The US-backed Maidan coup and US & Ukraine-supported fascist paramilitary attacks on eastern & southern Ukraine: Reuters, 2014: Leaked audio reveals embarrassing U.S. exchange on Ukraine, EU Leaked recording between Nuland and Pyatt: audio | transcript Counterpunch, 2014: US Imperialism and the Ukraine Coup BBC, 2014: Ukraine underplays role of far right in conflict Human Rights Watch, 2014: Ukraine: Unguided Rockets Killing Civilians Consortium News, 2015: The Mess That Nuland Made Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland engineered Ukraine’s regime change without weighing the likely consequences. The Hill, 2017: The reality of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is far from Kremlin propaganda The Guardian, 2017: 'I want to bring up a warrior': Ukraine's far-right children's camp – video WaPo, 2018: The war in Ukraine is more devastating than you know Reuters, 2018: Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem The Nation, 2019: Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine openDemocracy, 2019: Why Ukraine’s new language law will have long-term consequences Al Jazeera, 2022: Why did Ukraine suspend 11 ‘pro-Russia’ parties? Jacobin, 2022: A US-Backed, Far Right–Led Revolution in Ukraine Helped Bring Us to the Brink of War Consortium News, 2023: The West’s Sabotage of Peace in Ukraine Former Israeli Prime Minister Bennett’s recent comments about getting his mediation efforts squashed in the early days of the war adds more to the growing pile of evidence that Western powers are intent on regime change in Russia. Internationalist 360°, 2022–2024: History of Fascism in Ukraine: Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV NYT, 2024: U.N. Court to Rule on Whether Ukraine Committed Genocide NATO expansion: George Washington Univ., 2017: NATO Expansion: What Gorbachev Heard Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner Orinoco Tribune, 2022: Former German Chancellor Merkel Admits that Minsk Peace Agreements Were Part of Scheme for Ukraine to Buy Time to Prepare for War With Russia Al Mayadeen, 2023: Zelensky admits he never intended to implement Minsk agreements Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: The War in Ukraine Was Provoked—and Why That Matters to Achieve Peace Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: NATO Chief Admits NATO Expansion Was Key to Russian Invasion of Ukraine NATO in general: The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance Noam Chomsky, 2023: NATO “most violent, aggressive alliance in the world” Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It permalink fedilink source parent [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) He'll yeah borther semper pie permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (1 child) It's an old leftbook meme making fun of guys like you but don't let that get in the way of your corny qanon-ass conspiracies about Russian spies👍 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -2 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 9 months ago (15 children) One would argue that the aggressor should be making concessions not the victim, but it seems like you've already picked a side. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (14 children) You could argue that, if you were both woefully uninformed about who the aggressor is and laughably ignorant about how armed conflict works. You could. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children) I'm just the most decorated veteran in my family with 5 generations of service, but sure teach me how armed conflict works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Ukraine provoked said war for 8 years. Fully believing (or being led to believe) it would win. it did ethnic cleansing in Donbas during that time and was preparing to finish the job when Russia brought the Hammer down In a war the losing side has to make concessions to reach peace, not the winning side. Russia is winning that war, ergo Ukraine has to make concessions. In WW2 Japan surrendered unconditionally, it was not the Allies who made any concessions to Japan. When Prussia invaded Denmark, Denmark conceded Holstein to Prussia. Prussia did not concede anything to Denmark, it won that war. Did you per chance believe that Mexico turned over half of its territory to the USA because it was in a good mode or something? The US defeated Mexico in a war, Mexico had to make huge territorial concessions. It is completely irrelevant who was the agressor in this regard. In other words: Why should I concede you something when I am in a position to take more? You have to concede something to prevent me from taking more. 5 generations of not knowing how peace making works. Something any grand strategy video game would've teached you. Or looking up any war in history. Loser makes concessions, how hard is this to get? permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) No problem! So when you win, you get to set the terms of the treaty. When you lose, you don't. Surprised they didn't go over this in war school, but whatev I'm happy to help permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) I fail to see what this has to do with Ukraine. You're going to have to pull out your 2 dollar words. The war isn't over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. Until then there is no winner or loser. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children) No worries: -Russia Win -Ukraine Lose -Winner get write rules The war isn’t over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. -Sentences spoken from a bunker in Berlin. You're a decorated imperial veteran and you don't understand the concept of "combat ineffective?" What were they even teaching you in war crimes school? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) So you're rooting for Russia. Got it. Have a good life. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Lol @ the spiteful sports team mentality. Yeah man i got two big RUSSIA foam fingers. Everyone is twelve now. permalink fedilink source parent [+] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago Sigh Allow me, @RiverRock@lemmy.ml. The US-backed Maidan coup and US & Ukraine-supported fascist paramilitary attacks on eastern & southern Ukraine: Reuters, 2014: Leaked audio reveals embarrassing U.S. exchange on Ukraine, EU Leaked recording between Nuland and Pyatt: audio | transcript Counterpunch, 2014: US Imperialism and the Ukraine Coup BBC, 2014: Ukraine underplays role of far right in conflict Human Rights Watch, 2014: Ukraine: Unguided Rockets Killing Civilians Consortium News, 2015: The Mess That Nuland Made Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland engineered Ukraine’s regime change without weighing the likely consequences. The Hill, 2017: The reality of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is far from Kremlin propaganda The Guardian, 2017: 'I want to bring up a warrior': Ukraine's far-right children's camp – video WaPo, 2018: The war in Ukraine is more devastating than you know Reuters, 2018: Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem The Nation, 2019: Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine openDemocracy, 2019: Why Ukraine’s new language law will have long-term consequences Al Jazeera, 2022: Why did Ukraine suspend 11 ‘pro-Russia’ parties? Jacobin, 2022: A US-Backed, Far Right–Led Revolution in Ukraine Helped Bring Us to the Brink of War Consortium News, 2023: The West’s Sabotage of Peace in Ukraine Former Israeli Prime Minister Bennett’s recent comments about getting his mediation efforts squashed in the early days of the war adds more to the growing pile of evidence that Western powers are intent on regime change in Russia. Internationalist 360°, 2022–2024: History of Fascism in Ukraine: Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV NYT, 2024: U.N. Court to Rule on Whether Ukraine Committed Genocide NATO expansion: George Washington Univ., 2017: NATO Expansion: What Gorbachev Heard Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner Orinoco Tribune, 2022: Former German Chancellor Merkel Admits that Minsk Peace Agreements Were Part of Scheme for Ukraine to Buy Time to Prepare for War With Russia Al Mayadeen, 2023: Zelensky admits he never intended to implement Minsk agreements Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: The War in Ukraine Was Provoked—and Why That Matters to Achieve Peace Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: NATO Chief Admits NATO Expansion Was Key to Russian Invasion of Ukraine NATO in general: The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance Noam Chomsky, 2023: NATO “most violent, aggressive alliance in the world” Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It permalink fedilink source parent [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) He'll yeah borther semper pie permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (1 child) It's an old leftbook meme making fun of guys like you but don't let that get in the way of your corny qanon-ass conspiracies about Russian spies👍 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -2 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (14 children) You could argue that, if you were both woefully uninformed about who the aggressor is and laughably ignorant about how armed conflict works. You could. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children) I'm just the most decorated veteran in my family with 5 generations of service, but sure teach me how armed conflict works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Ukraine provoked said war for 8 years. Fully believing (or being led to believe) it would win. it did ethnic cleansing in Donbas during that time and was preparing to finish the job when Russia brought the Hammer down In a war the losing side has to make concessions to reach peace, not the winning side. Russia is winning that war, ergo Ukraine has to make concessions. In WW2 Japan surrendered unconditionally, it was not the Allies who made any concessions to Japan. When Prussia invaded Denmark, Denmark conceded Holstein to Prussia. Prussia did not concede anything to Denmark, it won that war. Did you per chance believe that Mexico turned over half of its territory to the USA because it was in a good mode or something? The US defeated Mexico in a war, Mexico had to make huge territorial concessions. It is completely irrelevant who was the agressor in this regard. In other words: Why should I concede you something when I am in a position to take more? You have to concede something to prevent me from taking more. 5 generations of not knowing how peace making works. Something any grand strategy video game would've teached you. Or looking up any war in history. Loser makes concessions, how hard is this to get? permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) No problem! So when you win, you get to set the terms of the treaty. When you lose, you don't. Surprised they didn't go over this in war school, but whatev I'm happy to help permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) I fail to see what this has to do with Ukraine. You're going to have to pull out your 2 dollar words. The war isn't over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. Until then there is no winner or loser. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children) No worries: -Russia Win -Ukraine Lose -Winner get write rules The war isn’t over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. -Sentences spoken from a bunker in Berlin. You're a decorated imperial veteran and you don't understand the concept of "combat ineffective?" What were they even teaching you in war crimes school? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) So you're rooting for Russia. Got it. Have a good life. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Lol @ the spiteful sports team mentality. Yeah man i got two big RUSSIA foam fingers. Everyone is twelve now. permalink fedilink source parent [+] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago Sigh Allow me, @RiverRock@lemmy.ml. The US-backed Maidan coup and US & Ukraine-supported fascist paramilitary attacks on eastern & southern Ukraine: Reuters, 2014: Leaked audio reveals embarrassing U.S. exchange on Ukraine, EU Leaked recording between Nuland and Pyatt: audio | transcript Counterpunch, 2014: US Imperialism and the Ukraine Coup BBC, 2014: Ukraine underplays role of far right in conflict Human Rights Watch, 2014: Ukraine: Unguided Rockets Killing Civilians Consortium News, 2015: The Mess That Nuland Made Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland engineered Ukraine’s regime change without weighing the likely consequences. The Hill, 2017: The reality of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is far from Kremlin propaganda The Guardian, 2017: 'I want to bring up a warrior': Ukraine's far-right children's camp – video WaPo, 2018: The war in Ukraine is more devastating than you know Reuters, 2018: Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem The Nation, 2019: Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine openDemocracy, 2019: Why Ukraine’s new language law will have long-term consequences Al Jazeera, 2022: Why did Ukraine suspend 11 ‘pro-Russia’ parties? Jacobin, 2022: A US-Backed, Far Right–Led Revolution in Ukraine Helped Bring Us to the Brink of War Consortium News, 2023: The West’s Sabotage of Peace in Ukraine Former Israeli Prime Minister Bennett’s recent comments about getting his mediation efforts squashed in the early days of the war adds more to the growing pile of evidence that Western powers are intent on regime change in Russia. Internationalist 360°, 2022–2024: History of Fascism in Ukraine: Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV NYT, 2024: U.N. Court to Rule on Whether Ukraine Committed Genocide NATO expansion: George Washington Univ., 2017: NATO Expansion: What Gorbachev Heard Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner Orinoco Tribune, 2022: Former German Chancellor Merkel Admits that Minsk Peace Agreements Were Part of Scheme for Ukraine to Buy Time to Prepare for War With Russia Al Mayadeen, 2023: Zelensky admits he never intended to implement Minsk agreements Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: The War in Ukraine Was Provoked—and Why That Matters to Achieve Peace Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: NATO Chief Admits NATO Expansion Was Key to Russian Invasion of Ukraine NATO in general: The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance Noam Chomsky, 2023: NATO “most violent, aggressive alliance in the world” Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It permalink fedilink source parent [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) He'll yeah borther semper pie permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (1 child) It's an old leftbook meme making fun of guys like you but don't let that get in the way of your corny qanon-ass conspiracies about Russian spies👍 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -2 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children) I'm just the most decorated veteran in my family with 5 generations of service, but sure teach me how armed conflict works. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Ukraine provoked said war for 8 years. Fully believing (or being led to believe) it would win. it did ethnic cleansing in Donbas during that time and was preparing to finish the job when Russia brought the Hammer down In a war the losing side has to make concessions to reach peace, not the winning side. Russia is winning that war, ergo Ukraine has to make concessions. In WW2 Japan surrendered unconditionally, it was not the Allies who made any concessions to Japan. When Prussia invaded Denmark, Denmark conceded Holstein to Prussia. Prussia did not concede anything to Denmark, it won that war. Did you per chance believe that Mexico turned over half of its territory to the USA because it was in a good mode or something? The US defeated Mexico in a war, Mexico had to make huge territorial concessions. It is completely irrelevant who was the agressor in this regard. In other words: Why should I concede you something when I am in a position to take more? You have to concede something to prevent me from taking more. 5 generations of not knowing how peace making works. Something any grand strategy video game would've teached you. Or looking up any war in history. Loser makes concessions, how hard is this to get? permalink fedilink source parent [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) No problem! So when you win, you get to set the terms of the treaty. When you lose, you don't. Surprised they didn't go over this in war school, but whatev I'm happy to help permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) I fail to see what this has to do with Ukraine. You're going to have to pull out your 2 dollar words. The war isn't over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. Until then there is no winner or loser. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children) No worries: -Russia Win -Ukraine Lose -Winner get write rules The war isn’t over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. -Sentences spoken from a bunker in Berlin. You're a decorated imperial veteran and you don't understand the concept of "combat ineffective?" What were they even teaching you in war crimes school? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) So you're rooting for Russia. Got it. Have a good life. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Lol @ the spiteful sports team mentality. Yeah man i got two big RUSSIA foam fingers. Everyone is twelve now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Ukraine provoked said war for 8 years. Fully believing (or being led to believe) it would win. it did ethnic cleansing in Donbas during that time and was preparing to finish the job when Russia brought the Hammer down In a war the losing side has to make concessions to reach peace, not the winning side. Russia is winning that war, ergo Ukraine has to make concessions. In WW2 Japan surrendered unconditionally, it was not the Allies who made any concessions to Japan. When Prussia invaded Denmark, Denmark conceded Holstein to Prussia. Prussia did not concede anything to Denmark, it won that war. Did you per chance believe that Mexico turned over half of its territory to the USA because it was in a good mode or something? The US defeated Mexico in a war, Mexico had to make huge territorial concessions. It is completely irrelevant who was the agressor in this regard. In other words: Why should I concede you something when I am in a position to take more? You have to concede something to prevent me from taking more. 5 generations of not knowing how peace making works. Something any grand strategy video game would've teached you. Or looking up any war in history. Loser makes concessions, how hard is this to get? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) No problem! So when you win, you get to set the terms of the treaty. When you lose, you don't. Surprised they didn't go over this in war school, but whatev I'm happy to help permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) I fail to see what this has to do with Ukraine. You're going to have to pull out your 2 dollar words. The war isn't over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. Until then there is no winner or loser. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children) No worries: -Russia Win -Ukraine Lose -Winner get write rules The war isn’t over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. -Sentences spoken from a bunker in Berlin. You're a decorated imperial veteran and you don't understand the concept of "combat ineffective?" What were they even teaching you in war crimes school? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) So you're rooting for Russia. Got it. Have a good life. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Lol @ the spiteful sports team mentality. Yeah man i got two big RUSSIA foam fingers. Everyone is twelve now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) I fail to see what this has to do with Ukraine. You're going to have to pull out your 2 dollar words. The war isn't over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. Until then there is no winner or loser. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children) No worries: -Russia Win -Ukraine Lose -Winner get write rules The war isn’t over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. -Sentences spoken from a bunker in Berlin. You're a decorated imperial veteran and you don't understand the concept of "combat ineffective?" What were they even teaching you in war crimes school? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) So you're rooting for Russia. Got it. Have a good life. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Lol @ the spiteful sports team mentality. Yeah man i got two big RUSSIA foam fingers. Everyone is twelve now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children) No worries: -Russia Win -Ukraine Lose -Winner get write rules The war isn’t over until either one side is destroyed or they make peace. -Sentences spoken from a bunker in Berlin. You're a decorated imperial veteran and you don't understand the concept of "combat ineffective?" What were they even teaching you in war crimes school? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) So you're rooting for Russia. Got it. Have a good life. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Lol @ the spiteful sports team mentality. Yeah man i got two big RUSSIA foam fingers. Everyone is twelve now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 child) So you're rooting for Russia. Got it. Have a good life. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Lol @ the spiteful sports team mentality. Yeah man i got two big RUSSIA foam fingers. Everyone is twelve now. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) Lol @ the spiteful sports team mentality. Yeah man i got two big RUSSIA foam fingers. Everyone is twelve now. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 9 months ago (6 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago Sigh Allow me, @RiverRock@lemmy.ml. The US-backed Maidan coup and US & Ukraine-supported fascist paramilitary attacks on eastern & southern Ukraine: Reuters, 2014: Leaked audio reveals embarrassing U.S. exchange on Ukraine, EU Leaked recording between Nuland and Pyatt: audio | transcript Counterpunch, 2014: US Imperialism and the Ukraine Coup BBC, 2014: Ukraine underplays role of far right in conflict Human Rights Watch, 2014: Ukraine: Unguided Rockets Killing Civilians Consortium News, 2015: The Mess That Nuland Made Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland engineered Ukraine’s regime change without weighing the likely consequences. The Hill, 2017: The reality of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is far from Kremlin propaganda The Guardian, 2017: 'I want to bring up a warrior': Ukraine's far-right children's camp – video WaPo, 2018: The war in Ukraine is more devastating than you know Reuters, 2018: Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem The Nation, 2019: Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine openDemocracy, 2019: Why Ukraine’s new language law will have long-term consequences Al Jazeera, 2022: Why did Ukraine suspend 11 ‘pro-Russia’ parties? Jacobin, 2022: A US-Backed, Far Right–Led Revolution in Ukraine Helped Bring Us to the Brink of War Consortium News, 2023: The West’s Sabotage of Peace in Ukraine Former Israeli Prime Minister Bennett’s recent comments about getting his mediation efforts squashed in the early days of the war adds more to the growing pile of evidence that Western powers are intent on regime change in Russia. Internationalist 360°, 2022–2024: History of Fascism in Ukraine: Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV NYT, 2024: U.N. Court to Rule on Whether Ukraine Committed Genocide NATO expansion: George Washington Univ., 2017: NATO Expansion: What Gorbachev Heard Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner Orinoco Tribune, 2022: Former German Chancellor Merkel Admits that Minsk Peace Agreements Were Part of Scheme for Ukraine to Buy Time to Prepare for War With Russia Al Mayadeen, 2023: Zelensky admits he never intended to implement Minsk agreements Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: The War in Ukraine Was Provoked—and Why That Matters to Achieve Peace Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: NATO Chief Admits NATO Expansion Was Key to Russian Invasion of Ukraine NATO in general: The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance Noam Chomsky, 2023: NATO “most violent, aggressive alliance in the world” Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It permalink fedilink source parent [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) He'll yeah borther semper pie permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (1 child) It's an old leftbook meme making fun of guys like you but don't let that get in the way of your corny qanon-ass conspiracies about Russian spies👍 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -2 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago Sigh Allow me, @RiverRock@lemmy.ml. The US-backed Maidan coup and US & Ukraine-supported fascist paramilitary attacks on eastern & southern Ukraine: Reuters, 2014: Leaked audio reveals embarrassing U.S. exchange on Ukraine, EU Leaked recording between Nuland and Pyatt: audio | transcript Counterpunch, 2014: US Imperialism and the Ukraine Coup BBC, 2014: Ukraine underplays role of far right in conflict Human Rights Watch, 2014: Ukraine: Unguided Rockets Killing Civilians Consortium News, 2015: The Mess That Nuland Made Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland engineered Ukraine’s regime change without weighing the likely consequences. The Hill, 2017: The reality of neo-Nazis in Ukraine is far from Kremlin propaganda The Guardian, 2017: 'I want to bring up a warrior': Ukraine's far-right children's camp – video WaPo, 2018: The war in Ukraine is more devastating than you know Reuters, 2018: Ukraine’s neo-Nazi problem The Nation, 2019: Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine openDemocracy, 2019: Why Ukraine’s new language law will have long-term consequences Al Jazeera, 2022: Why did Ukraine suspend 11 ‘pro-Russia’ parties? Jacobin, 2022: A US-Backed, Far Right–Led Revolution in Ukraine Helped Bring Us to the Brink of War Consortium News, 2023: The West’s Sabotage of Peace in Ukraine Former Israeli Prime Minister Bennett’s recent comments about getting his mediation efforts squashed in the early days of the war adds more to the growing pile of evidence that Western powers are intent on regime change in Russia. Internationalist 360°, 2022–2024: History of Fascism in Ukraine: Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV NYT, 2024: U.N. Court to Rule on Whether Ukraine Committed Genocide NATO expansion: George Washington Univ., 2017: NATO Expansion: What Gorbachev Heard Declassified documents show security assurances against NATO expansion to Soviet leaders from Baker, Bush, Genscher, Kohl, Gates, Mitterrand, Thatcher, Hurd, Major, and Woerner Orinoco Tribune, 2022: Former German Chancellor Merkel Admits that Minsk Peace Agreements Were Part of Scheme for Ukraine to Buy Time to Prepare for War With Russia Al Mayadeen, 2023: Zelensky admits he never intended to implement Minsk agreements Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: The War in Ukraine Was Provoked—and Why That Matters to Achieve Peace Jeffrey Sachs, 2023: NATO Chief Admits NATO Expansion Was Key to Russian Invasion of Ukraine NATO in general: The Intercept, 2021: Meet NATO, the Dangerous “Defensive” Alliance Trying to Run the World CounterPunch, 2022: NATO is Not a Defensive Alliance Noam Chomsky, 2023: NATO “most violent, aggressive alliance in the world” Thomas Fazi, 2024: NATO: 75 years of war, unprovoked aggressions and state-sponsored terrorism Gabriel Rockhill, 2020: The U.S. Did Not Defeat Fascism in WWII, It Discretely Internationalized It permalink fedilink source parent
[+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (4 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) He'll yeah borther semper pie permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (1 child) It's an old leftbook meme making fun of guys like you but don't let that get in the way of your corny qanon-ass conspiracies about Russian spies👍 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -2 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) He'll yeah borther semper pie permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (1 child) It's an old leftbook meme making fun of guys like you but don't let that get in the way of your corny qanon-ass conspiracies about Russian spies👍 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -2 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -3 points 9 months ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (1 child) It's an old leftbook meme making fun of guys like you but don't let that get in the way of your corny qanon-ass conspiracies about Russian spies👍 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -2 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (1 child) It's an old leftbook meme making fun of guys like you but don't let that get in the way of your corny qanon-ass conspiracies about Russian spies👍 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz -2 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Sideshow_B00b@lemmy.zip -7 points 9 months ago (15 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 22 points 9 months ago (14 children) Shitlibs complain about .ml censoring them and then when you actually look it's them getting a comment removed (not even a ban) for calling people evil Russians and telling them to kill themselves permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] sephallen@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago (13 children) I literally had a comment removed and was soft banned from World News for suggesting you had an alt account with no explanation why. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 14 points 9 months ago (5 children) You said it yourself: for suggesting that he had an alt account. That could get you a ban on dbzer0 as well, in that case for “bad-jacketing”: https://wiki.dbzer0.com/divisions-by-zero/the-golden-rules/ Don’t be shitty. i.e. telling people to kill themselves, or bad-jacketing is bannable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Thank you for the explanation, it might be worth adding bad-jacketing to the rules or code of conduct. Is dbzer0 somehow related to lemmy.ml? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) No, dbzer0 is its own thing. What they have in common is they’re both run by socialists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago (2 children) Does being accused of being a bot qualify as bad-jacketing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (1 child) The dbzer0 admins seem to think so, from what I’ve seen, but you’d have to ask them. The point is, unless you have the receipts to prove it, don’t call someone a bot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago I can get behind that, thanks again for clarifying things. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (6 children) You got a one day ban for direct personal attacks. Once again: people complaining about .ml "censoring" them are always just people mad that the rules got enforced on them when they're used to the mods giving them a parse for having the same politics permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -4 points 9 months ago (5 children) You're wrong, it was for bad-jacketing which currently is not actually in the rules for lemmy.ml or that News community. I did not make any personal attacks, but I have seen a lot on here which do not get removed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) Ah huh. You can play dumb if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -5 points 9 months ago (3 children) I am pretty curious as to how you'd know more details about my comment removal and ban than I do. It would be pretty unethical if you had access to a mod account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (2 children) Because I can read the modlog, genius. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago (1 child) Thank you for the kind words and the tip! It seems like the comment was removed because it broke Rule 2: "Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here." I'm also still banned from that community - presumably it was a 3 day ban and not 24 hours. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago You're correct: it was not a 24 hour ban: I misread it because it happened to have 24 hours left when I checked it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 22 points 9 months ago (14 children) Shitlibs complain about .ml censoring them and then when you actually look it's them getting a comment removed (not even a ban) for calling people evil Russians and telling them to kill themselves permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [+] sephallen@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago (13 children) I literally had a comment removed and was soft banned from World News for suggesting you had an alt account with no explanation why. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 14 points 9 months ago (5 children) You said it yourself: for suggesting that he had an alt account. That could get you a ban on dbzer0 as well, in that case for “bad-jacketing”: https://wiki.dbzer0.com/divisions-by-zero/the-golden-rules/ Don’t be shitty. i.e. telling people to kill themselves, or bad-jacketing is bannable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Thank you for the explanation, it might be worth adding bad-jacketing to the rules or code of conduct. Is dbzer0 somehow related to lemmy.ml? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) No, dbzer0 is its own thing. What they have in common is they’re both run by socialists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago (2 children) Does being accused of being a bot qualify as bad-jacketing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (1 child) The dbzer0 admins seem to think so, from what I’ve seen, but you’d have to ask them. The point is, unless you have the receipts to prove it, don’t call someone a bot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago I can get behind that, thanks again for clarifying things. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (6 children) You got a one day ban for direct personal attacks. Once again: people complaining about .ml "censoring" them are always just people mad that the rules got enforced on them when they're used to the mods giving them a parse for having the same politics permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -4 points 9 months ago (5 children) You're wrong, it was for bad-jacketing which currently is not actually in the rules for lemmy.ml or that News community. I did not make any personal attacks, but I have seen a lot on here which do not get removed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) Ah huh. You can play dumb if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -5 points 9 months ago (3 children) I am pretty curious as to how you'd know more details about my comment removal and ban than I do. It would be pretty unethical if you had access to a mod account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (2 children) Because I can read the modlog, genius. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago (1 child) Thank you for the kind words and the tip! It seems like the comment was removed because it broke Rule 2: "Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here." I'm also still banned from that community - presumably it was a 3 day ban and not 24 hours. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago You're correct: it was not a 24 hour ban: I misread it because it happened to have 24 hours left when I checked it. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] sephallen@lemmy.ml -7 points 9 months ago (13 children) I literally had a comment removed and was soft banned from World News for suggesting you had an alt account with no explanation why. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 14 points 9 months ago (5 children) You said it yourself: for suggesting that he had an alt account. That could get you a ban on dbzer0 as well, in that case for “bad-jacketing”: https://wiki.dbzer0.com/divisions-by-zero/the-golden-rules/ Don’t be shitty. i.e. telling people to kill themselves, or bad-jacketing is bannable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Thank you for the explanation, it might be worth adding bad-jacketing to the rules or code of conduct. Is dbzer0 somehow related to lemmy.ml? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) No, dbzer0 is its own thing. What they have in common is they’re both run by socialists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago (2 children) Does being accused of being a bot qualify as bad-jacketing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (1 child) The dbzer0 admins seem to think so, from what I’ve seen, but you’d have to ask them. The point is, unless you have the receipts to prove it, don’t call someone a bot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago I can get behind that, thanks again for clarifying things. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (6 children) You got a one day ban for direct personal attacks. Once again: people complaining about .ml "censoring" them are always just people mad that the rules got enforced on them when they're used to the mods giving them a parse for having the same politics permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -4 points 9 months ago (5 children) You're wrong, it was for bad-jacketing which currently is not actually in the rules for lemmy.ml or that News community. I did not make any personal attacks, but I have seen a lot on here which do not get removed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) Ah huh. You can play dumb if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -5 points 9 months ago (3 children) I am pretty curious as to how you'd know more details about my comment removal and ban than I do. It would be pretty unethical if you had access to a mod account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (2 children) Because I can read the modlog, genius. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago (1 child) Thank you for the kind words and the tip! It seems like the comment was removed because it broke Rule 2: "Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here." I'm also still banned from that community - presumably it was a 3 day ban and not 24 hours. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago You're correct: it was not a 24 hour ban: I misread it because it happened to have 24 hours left when I checked it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 14 points 9 months ago (5 children) You said it yourself: for suggesting that he had an alt account. That could get you a ban on dbzer0 as well, in that case for “bad-jacketing”: https://wiki.dbzer0.com/divisions-by-zero/the-golden-rules/ Don’t be shitty. i.e. telling people to kill themselves, or bad-jacketing is bannable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Thank you for the explanation, it might be worth adding bad-jacketing to the rules or code of conduct. Is dbzer0 somehow related to lemmy.ml? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) No, dbzer0 is its own thing. What they have in common is they’re both run by socialists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago (2 children) Does being accused of being a bot qualify as bad-jacketing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (1 child) The dbzer0 admins seem to think so, from what I’ve seen, but you’d have to ask them. The point is, unless you have the receipts to prove it, don’t call someone a bot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago I can get behind that, thanks again for clarifying things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 1 point 9 months ago (4 children) Thank you for the explanation, it might be worth adding bad-jacketing to the rules or code of conduct. Is dbzer0 somehow related to lemmy.ml? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) No, dbzer0 is its own thing. What they have in common is they’re both run by socialists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago (2 children) Does being accused of being a bot qualify as bad-jacketing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (1 child) The dbzer0 admins seem to think so, from what I’ve seen, but you’d have to ask them. The point is, unless you have the receipts to prove it, don’t call someone a bot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago I can get behind that, thanks again for clarifying things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children) No, dbzer0 is its own thing. What they have in common is they’re both run by socialists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago (2 children) Does being accused of being a bot qualify as bad-jacketing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (1 child) The dbzer0 admins seem to think so, from what I’ve seen, but you’d have to ask them. The point is, unless you have the receipts to prove it, don’t call someone a bot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago I can get behind that, thanks again for clarifying things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 months ago (2 children) Does being accused of being a bot qualify as bad-jacketing? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] davel@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (1 child) The dbzer0 admins seem to think so, from what I’ve seen, but you’d have to ask them. The point is, unless you have the receipts to prove it, don’t call someone a bot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago I can get behind that, thanks again for clarifying things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 12 points 9 months ago (1 child) The dbzer0 admins seem to think so, from what I’ve seen, but you’d have to ask them. The point is, unless you have the receipts to prove it, don’t call someone a bot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago I can get behind that, thanks again for clarifying things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sephallen@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago I can get behind that, thanks again for clarifying things. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (6 children) You got a one day ban for direct personal attacks. Once again: people complaining about .ml "censoring" them are always just people mad that the rules got enforced on them when they're used to the mods giving them a parse for having the same politics permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -4 points 9 months ago (5 children) You're wrong, it was for bad-jacketing which currently is not actually in the rules for lemmy.ml or that News community. I did not make any personal attacks, but I have seen a lot on here which do not get removed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) Ah huh. You can play dumb if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -5 points 9 months ago (3 children) I am pretty curious as to how you'd know more details about my comment removal and ban than I do. It would be pretty unethical if you had access to a mod account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (2 children) Because I can read the modlog, genius. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago (1 child) Thank you for the kind words and the tip! It seems like the comment was removed because it broke Rule 2: "Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here." I'm also still banned from that community - presumably it was a 3 day ban and not 24 hours. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago You're correct: it was not a 24 hour ban: I misread it because it happened to have 24 hours left when I checked it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -4 points 9 months ago (5 children) You're wrong, it was for bad-jacketing which currently is not actually in the rules for lemmy.ml or that News community. I did not make any personal attacks, but I have seen a lot on here which do not get removed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) Ah huh. You can play dumb if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -5 points 9 months ago (3 children) I am pretty curious as to how you'd know more details about my comment removal and ban than I do. It would be pretty unethical if you had access to a mod account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (2 children) Because I can read the modlog, genius. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago (1 child) Thank you for the kind words and the tip! It seems like the comment was removed because it broke Rule 2: "Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here." I'm also still banned from that community - presumably it was a 3 day ban and not 24 hours. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago You're correct: it was not a 24 hour ban: I misread it because it happened to have 24 hours left when I checked it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (4 children) Ah huh. You can play dumb if you like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -5 points 9 months ago (3 children) I am pretty curious as to how you'd know more details about my comment removal and ban than I do. It would be pretty unethical if you had access to a mod account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (2 children) Because I can read the modlog, genius. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago (1 child) Thank you for the kind words and the tip! It seems like the comment was removed because it broke Rule 2: "Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here." I'm also still banned from that community - presumably it was a 3 day ban and not 24 hours. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago You're correct: it was not a 24 hour ban: I misread it because it happened to have 24 hours left when I checked it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -5 points 9 months ago (3 children) I am pretty curious as to how you'd know more details about my comment removal and ban than I do. It would be pretty unethical if you had access to a mod account. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (2 children) Because I can read the modlog, genius. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago (1 child) Thank you for the kind words and the tip! It seems like the comment was removed because it broke Rule 2: "Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here." I'm also still banned from that community - presumably it was a 3 day ban and not 24 hours. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago You're correct: it was not a 24 hour ban: I misread it because it happened to have 24 hours left when I checked it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (2 children) Because I can read the modlog, genius. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago (1 child) Thank you for the kind words and the tip! It seems like the comment was removed because it broke Rule 2: "Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here." I'm also still banned from that community - presumably it was a 3 day ban and not 24 hours. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago You're correct: it was not a 24 hour ban: I misread it because it happened to have 24 hours left when I checked it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sephallen@lemmy.ml -3 points 9 months ago (1 child) Thank you for the kind words and the tip! It seems like the comment was removed because it broke Rule 2: "Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here." I'm also still banned from that community - presumably it was a 3 day ban and not 24 hours. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago You're correct: it was not a 24 hour ban: I misread it because it happened to have 24 hours left when I checked it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago You're correct: it was not a 24 hour ban: I misread it because it happened to have 24 hours left when I checked it. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Sideshow_B00b@lemmy.zip -8 points 9 months ago (1 child) Oh you guys with your pro-Ruzzia hard-ons. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] bobr@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org 10 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] bobr@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org 10 points 9 months ago [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent