▲ 1480 ▼ Wouldn't want anyone to know (media.piefed.world) submitted 9 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world to c/memes@lemmy.world 85 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social 148 points 9 months ago (4 children) It's so dumb. Just let people rate it with the five stars. They're so gun-ho with the algorithm let it do its job. permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 128 points 9 months ago (2 children) They don't want you knowing what other people think of the video. It's just about what you think of the video. Much easier to have an algorithmically perfect echo chamber if everyone is privately rating things and has no idea what others think about them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] relic__@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (2 children) Wouldn't the simplest solution be to only expose the other ratings after you rate? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago Well it isn't beneficial for the company because people might realize they hold unpopular opinions and the company wants to be able to control the people's opinions regardless of popularity, that way they can keep users on the site engaging with that content for longer. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Koarnine@pawb.social 1 point 9 months ago But then how do you stop people clicking to see first, locking them in? But then how do you deal with missclicks? permalink fedilink source parent [–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* Advertisers forgetting that every person is an accumulation of other pelople influencing their behavior permalink fedilink source parent [–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 61 points 9 months ago It's all bots anyway permalink fedilink source parent [–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 29 points 9 months ago The thumbs up/thumbs down thing was fine too. permalink fedilink source parent [–] abfarid@startrek.website 13 points 9 months ago (1 child) I'm pretty sure that 99% of the time 1 and 5 stars options were used, so like/dislike is enough. There isn't much point in including a "I have no strong feelings one way or another" button. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 6 points 9 months ago (1 child) Sure there is: A known quantity is always better than an unknown quantity. Though would be far more informative if rating was mandatory, or otherwise defaulted to 3 stars or some such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] abfarid@startrek.website 0 points 9 months ago Then just assume that video that hasn't been interacted with is 3 stars, same result. I could see there being an additional like above regular one, like love our something. But YT now kinda has the hype feature which I suppose does a similar job. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 128 points 9 months ago (2 children) They don't want you knowing what other people think of the video. It's just about what you think of the video. Much easier to have an algorithmically perfect echo chamber if everyone is privately rating things and has no idea what others think about them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] relic__@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (2 children) Wouldn't the simplest solution be to only expose the other ratings after you rate? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago Well it isn't beneficial for the company because people might realize they hold unpopular opinions and the company wants to be able to control the people's opinions regardless of popularity, that way they can keep users on the site engaging with that content for longer. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Koarnine@pawb.social 1 point 9 months ago But then how do you stop people clicking to see first, locking them in? But then how do you deal with missclicks? permalink fedilink source parent [–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* Advertisers forgetting that every person is an accumulation of other pelople influencing their behavior permalink fedilink source parent
[–] relic__@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (2 children) Wouldn't the simplest solution be to only expose the other ratings after you rate? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago Well it isn't beneficial for the company because people might realize they hold unpopular opinions and the company wants to be able to control the people's opinions regardless of popularity, that way they can keep users on the site engaging with that content for longer. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Koarnine@pawb.social 1 point 9 months ago But then how do you stop people clicking to see first, locking them in? But then how do you deal with missclicks? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago Well it isn't beneficial for the company because people might realize they hold unpopular opinions and the company wants to be able to control the people's opinions regardless of popularity, that way they can keep users on the site engaging with that content for longer. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Koarnine@pawb.social 1 point 9 months ago But then how do you stop people clicking to see first, locking them in? But then how do you deal with missclicks? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* Advertisers forgetting that every person is an accumulation of other pelople influencing their behavior permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 61 points 9 months ago It's all bots anyway permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 29 points 9 months ago The thumbs up/thumbs down thing was fine too. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 13 points 9 months ago (1 child) I'm pretty sure that 99% of the time 1 and 5 stars options were used, so like/dislike is enough. There isn't much point in including a "I have no strong feelings one way or another" button. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 6 points 9 months ago (1 child) Sure there is: A known quantity is always better than an unknown quantity. Though would be far more informative if rating was mandatory, or otherwise defaulted to 3 stars or some such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] abfarid@startrek.website 0 points 9 months ago Then just assume that video that hasn't been interacted with is 3 stars, same result. I could see there being an additional like above regular one, like love our something. But YT now kinda has the hype feature which I suppose does a similar job. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MotoAsh@piefed.social 6 points 9 months ago (1 child) Sure there is: A known quantity is always better than an unknown quantity. Though would be far more informative if rating was mandatory, or otherwise defaulted to 3 stars or some such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] abfarid@startrek.website 0 points 9 months ago Then just assume that video that hasn't been interacted with is 3 stars, same result. I could see there being an additional like above regular one, like love our something. But YT now kinda has the hype feature which I suppose does a similar job. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 0 points 9 months ago Then just assume that video that hasn't been interacted with is 3 stars, same result. I could see there being an additional like above regular one, like love our something. But YT now kinda has the hype feature which I suppose does a similar job. permalink fedilink source parent