you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 148 points 9 months ago (4 children)

It's so dumb. Just let people rate it with the five stars. They're so gun-ho with the algorithm let it do its job.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 128 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    They don't want you knowing what other people think of the video. It's just about what you think of the video. Much easier to have an algorithmically perfect echo chamber if everyone is privately rating things and has no idea what others think about them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 9 months ago (2 children)

    Wouldn't the simplest solution be to only expose the other ratings after you rate?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 9 months ago

    Well it isn't beneficial for the company because people might realize they hold unpopular opinions and the company wants to be able to control the people's opinions regardless of popularity, that way they can keep users on the site engaging with that content for longer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    I'm pretty sure that 99% of the time 1 and 5 stars options were used, so like/dislike is enough. There isn't much point in including a "I have no strong feelings one way or another" button.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 9 months ago (1 child)

    Sure there is: A known quantity is always better than an unknown quantity. Though would be far more informative if rating was mandatory, or otherwise defaulted to 3 stars or some such.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 9 months ago

    Then just assume that video that hasn't been interacted with is 3 stars, same result. I could see there being an additional like above regular one, like love our something. But YT now kinda has the hype feature which I suppose does a similar job.

  • source
  • parent