As a counter-argument, I never liked this. Because everyone who disagrees gets silenced and even made invisible.

During covid, it was pretty much impossible to disagree that we all must be vaccinated and isolated, or suggesting that natural immunity is much better than vaccinating for younger people. Only afterwards has it become accepted as the truth. During covid, you would be called a conspiracy theorist for talking about natural immunity instead of vaccines.

Even if you don't agree with this specific point, I wanted to bring it up and show how it creates a complete echo chamber and makes sure everyone seems to agree, because people who don't are silenced.

This means most people will not see that there is another way of seeing things, and they will believe that only one solution is possible.

Same thing with war scenarios. If you don't agree there should be a war, you are called unpatriotic. So many ways people get silenced. I think we should avoid that.