Always seen far rage as more of a bag of frogs then ferrets. But fair enough. It's Def a valid point that folks seem to pay very little attention to the internal fighting within reform. Dispite it's insane and unique ltd by shares structure meaning the leader literally is a CEO and has full control and responsibility for all corporate actions.

Unlike every other political parties LTD by garrentee structure.

As for the Tories. Were you asleep for the 14 years of constant infighting and policy turnarounds they saw. Or just following the lesser reports in mainstream media covering them.

As for labour. Yeah as an ex member, even the media is more then happy to share any row within their party over the last 100 years. But for fuck sake you have to be blind to suggest YP has not managed it's own short and motivated argument quicker and more uniformly then labour ever has.

But here are the facts from inside YP. From an old folk who has watched a few parties from. (Look back at the 80s LIbralDems history of multiple mini parties. )

As for the history of arguments in the greens. Yeah don't make me laugh. Their is a reason it's taken them decades to gain a sizable support. Thier internal history is a nightmare.

All movements have a period where they move from an idea to a formalised party. And every single party in history has faced attempts to take control at that point. Because that is the point where a parties founding docs are most up to be rewritten and manipulated,

The whole idea that a single argument settled withing a week. When a party is still forming. Is in anyway a measure of the parties competence. Is utter rubbish and nothing more then a right wing media wet dream. With no basis in reality at all.