▲ 1305 ▼ Save icon (suppo.fi) submitted 9 months ago by cm0002@suppo.fi to c/funny@sh.itjust.works 278 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 23 points 9 months ago (2 children) Maybe it's a super disk LS-240. They were up 240 MB. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SuperDisk permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children) I had one of those beast: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zip_drive Probably still have it somewhere among the dust. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] unphazed@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (2 children) I replaced my jazz drive when burners became more popular and cheaper. I could buy 100 cdrs for the price of a zip disk. I only had a zip drive to begin with so I could work on my high school projects in computer graphics class from home (ah, going back and forth between Windows and Mac in 1999... it sucked) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago (1 child) Yeah, Zip disks suuuucked. I always had to carry two for redundancy because they failed to read so often. Even having every second or third CD burn fail, because you looked at it wrong, was more reliable than Zip disks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unphazed@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) Error: Buffer Underrun Frisbee time!!! Wheeee! This is the reason I haven't thought too hard on bluray discs... $5 to $11 per disc... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) Have you actually had an issue with buffer underruns with blurays though? I'd figure reliability should be way up, considering we now have multi-core CPUs, plus writers probably support variable speed writing that slows the write if the buffer is running out of data, plus error correction/recovery options for if it happens anyways. I'd guess vibrations, low quality discs, and loss of power would be more likely to cause a write failure than a buffer underrun these days, but maybe I have too much faith in those involved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unphazed@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Maybe you're right. I've never tried burning blurays. The cost and error possibility just leaned me into using hard drives for storage. They last longer, are less likely to damage, and far cheaper. Even a used drive still has a few hundred thousand writes left, usually. permalink fedilink source parent [–] afox@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago I remember the smell of a new pack of discs. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 months ago Zip disks were originally launched with capacities of 100 MB, then 250 MB, and finally 750 MB. Congrats, you win! 🥳 permalink fedilink source parent [–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago Does it click? permalink fedilink source parent [–] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 1 point 9 months ago I had my best porn on one of those as a youth (because it meant nothing visible on my computer unless I wanted it to be) and then the drive died one day. RIP hours of downloading, plus all my games and music on my more legit disks. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago Could be a zipdisk! Those where up to what 750megs? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children) I had one of those beast: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zip_drive Probably still have it somewhere among the dust. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] unphazed@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (2 children) I replaced my jazz drive when burners became more popular and cheaper. I could buy 100 cdrs for the price of a zip disk. I only had a zip drive to begin with so I could work on my high school projects in computer graphics class from home (ah, going back and forth between Windows and Mac in 1999... it sucked) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago (1 child) Yeah, Zip disks suuuucked. I always had to carry two for redundancy because they failed to read so often. Even having every second or third CD burn fail, because you looked at it wrong, was more reliable than Zip disks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unphazed@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) Error: Buffer Underrun Frisbee time!!! Wheeee! This is the reason I haven't thought too hard on bluray discs... $5 to $11 per disc... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) Have you actually had an issue with buffer underruns with blurays though? I'd figure reliability should be way up, considering we now have multi-core CPUs, plus writers probably support variable speed writing that slows the write if the buffer is running out of data, plus error correction/recovery options for if it happens anyways. I'd guess vibrations, low quality discs, and loss of power would be more likely to cause a write failure than a buffer underrun these days, but maybe I have too much faith in those involved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unphazed@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Maybe you're right. I've never tried burning blurays. The cost and error possibility just leaned me into using hard drives for storage. They last longer, are less likely to damage, and far cheaper. Even a used drive still has a few hundred thousand writes left, usually. permalink fedilink source parent [–] afox@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago I remember the smell of a new pack of discs. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 months ago Zip disks were originally launched with capacities of 100 MB, then 250 MB, and finally 750 MB. Congrats, you win! 🥳 permalink fedilink source parent [–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago Does it click? permalink fedilink source parent [–] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 1 point 9 months ago I had my best porn on one of those as a youth (because it meant nothing visible on my computer unless I wanted it to be) and then the drive died one day. RIP hours of downloading, plus all my games and music on my more legit disks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (2 children) I replaced my jazz drive when burners became more popular and cheaper. I could buy 100 cdrs for the price of a zip disk. I only had a zip drive to begin with so I could work on my high school projects in computer graphics class from home (ah, going back and forth between Windows and Mac in 1999... it sucked) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago (1 child) Yeah, Zip disks suuuucked. I always had to carry two for redundancy because they failed to read so often. Even having every second or third CD burn fail, because you looked at it wrong, was more reliable than Zip disks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unphazed@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) Error: Buffer Underrun Frisbee time!!! Wheeee! This is the reason I haven't thought too hard on bluray discs... $5 to $11 per disc... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) Have you actually had an issue with buffer underruns with blurays though? I'd figure reliability should be way up, considering we now have multi-core CPUs, plus writers probably support variable speed writing that slows the write if the buffer is running out of data, plus error correction/recovery options for if it happens anyways. I'd guess vibrations, low quality discs, and loss of power would be more likely to cause a write failure than a buffer underrun these days, but maybe I have too much faith in those involved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unphazed@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Maybe you're right. I've never tried burning blurays. The cost and error possibility just leaned me into using hard drives for storage. They last longer, are less likely to damage, and far cheaper. Even a used drive still has a few hundred thousand writes left, usually. permalink fedilink source parent [–] afox@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago I remember the smell of a new pack of discs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MoonMelon@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago (1 child) Yeah, Zip disks suuuucked. I always had to carry two for redundancy because they failed to read so often. Even having every second or third CD burn fail, because you looked at it wrong, was more reliable than Zip disks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unphazed@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) Error: Buffer Underrun Frisbee time!!! Wheeee! This is the reason I haven't thought too hard on bluray discs... $5 to $11 per disc... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) Have you actually had an issue with buffer underruns with blurays though? I'd figure reliability should be way up, considering we now have multi-core CPUs, plus writers probably support variable speed writing that slows the write if the buffer is running out of data, plus error correction/recovery options for if it happens anyways. I'd guess vibrations, low quality discs, and loss of power would be more likely to cause a write failure than a buffer underrun these days, but maybe I have too much faith in those involved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unphazed@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Maybe you're right. I've never tried burning blurays. The cost and error possibility just leaned me into using hard drives for storage. They last longer, are less likely to damage, and far cheaper. Even a used drive still has a few hundred thousand writes left, usually. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 child) Error: Buffer Underrun Frisbee time!!! Wheeee! This is the reason I haven't thought too hard on bluray discs... $5 to $11 per disc... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) Have you actually had an issue with buffer underruns with blurays though? I'd figure reliability should be way up, considering we now have multi-core CPUs, plus writers probably support variable speed writing that slows the write if the buffer is running out of data, plus error correction/recovery options for if it happens anyways. I'd guess vibrations, low quality discs, and loss of power would be more likely to cause a write failure than a buffer underrun these days, but maybe I have too much faith in those involved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unphazed@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Maybe you're right. I've never tried burning blurays. The cost and error possibility just leaned me into using hard drives for storage. They last longer, are less likely to damage, and far cheaper. Even a used drive still has a few hundred thousand writes left, usually. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago (1 child) Have you actually had an issue with buffer underruns with blurays though? I'd figure reliability should be way up, considering we now have multi-core CPUs, plus writers probably support variable speed writing that slows the write if the buffer is running out of data, plus error correction/recovery options for if it happens anyways. I'd guess vibrations, low quality discs, and loss of power would be more likely to cause a write failure than a buffer underrun these days, but maybe I have too much faith in those involved. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] unphazed@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Maybe you're right. I've never tried burning blurays. The cost and error possibility just leaned me into using hard drives for storage. They last longer, are less likely to damage, and far cheaper. Even a used drive still has a few hundred thousand writes left, usually. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 1 point 9 months ago Maybe you're right. I've never tried burning blurays. The cost and error possibility just leaned me into using hard drives for storage. They last longer, are less likely to damage, and far cheaper. Even a used drive still has a few hundred thousand writes left, usually. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] afox@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago I remember the smell of a new pack of discs. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 months ago Zip disks were originally launched with capacities of 100 MB, then 250 MB, and finally 750 MB. Congrats, you win! 🥳 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 1 point 9 months ago I had my best porn on one of those as a youth (because it meant nothing visible on my computer unless I wanted it to be) and then the drive died one day. RIP hours of downloading, plus all my games and music on my more legit disks. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago Could be a zipdisk! Those where up to what 750megs? permalink fedilink source parent